Staff

Obviously not, thanks to DHE. Worst case scenario: the person who stole your phone will be able to connect to our VPN servers. You'll need to require a certificate revocation and new key issuing. Kind regards

Hello! That's not an Eddie feature. You just need to use our VPN DNS. Eddie takes care of that, just like other OpenVPN wrappers such as OpenVPN GUI, Tunnelblick... Of course, if you run OpenVPN under Linux or *BSD, and you don't take care about DNS push from the server, then your system would not query VPN DNS. Additional info here: https://airvpn.org/topic/9608-how-to-accept-dns-push-on-linux-systems-with-resolvconf Kind regards

Hello! So, our software is free and open source, 50 antivirus say that the package is just fine, but since 3 of them claim a bunch of highly dangerous threats, you have doubts and need a comment? Kind regards

Hello! We do not detect any problem with our VPN nameservers, please specify which server(s) you experience "slow resolution" on. With your setup, you provide info about the names you resolve to the final nameserver administrators, but such requests come from our VPN servers, so your privacy is preserved anyway. However, the problem is worth an investigation because only by querying our VPN DNS you can access the geo-routing service and resolve names in OpenNIC and NameCoin namespaces. Kind regards

That's exactly what Network Lock feature in Eddie does. Thread locked. Kind regards

Hello, problem confirmed, we are investigating. Kind regards

Hello, the test is performed on VPN server exit-IP address ports, not on your node. Kind regards

Hello, it looks like you're already getting the performance you want, as speedtest.net shows. Welcome aboard! Use our speed test only with the purpose to compare the ratio between in tunnel and out of tunnel performance, not for absolute values. For those, no speed test is reliable, test in real world usage. Kind regards

Hello, exit-IP addresses of VPN servers normally do not change. Anyway, we strongly recommend that you allow three different exit-IP addresses of different VPN servers in three different datacenters, in order to count on a robust failover and prevent lock-outs from your own machine. Kind regards

Thanks! They are fine, but they do not provide 1 Gbit/s connectivity to each server at the moment, and they can't specify when they will. We need 1 Gbit/s line/port per server in Czech Republic. Kind regards

Hello, it's a portable version, so... Kind regards

Hello! At the moment please run the portable version, the one that does NOT require Mono. Kind regards

Hello! We will do our best to replace servers in the Czech Republic, stay tuned. Kind regards

Hello! Due to imminent relocation of server Becrux from Czech Republic to the Netherlands, we are sorry to inform you that we are shutting the server down. The provider is leaving the datacenter in Zlin. Kind regards AirVPN Staff

Hello, you need to open a ticket and your issue will be fixed swiftly. Kind regards

Hello, as everybody knows Germany Federal Constitutional Court declared the implementation of the Data Retention Directive in Germany unconstitutional in 2010, well before the CJEU declared the Directive invalid (and also retroactively invalid) with its paramount decision in April 2014. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-04/cp140054en.pdf In the very same article you linked, you must have missed the following paragraph: On 8 April 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Directive 2006/24/EC invalid for violating fundamental rights. The Council's Legal Services have been reported to have stated in closed session that paragraph 59 of the European Court of Justice's ruling "suggests that general and blanket data retention is no longer possible" Kind regards

Hello! Unfortunately not, this is an important limitation of current OpenVPN software. Hopefully it will be resolved in version 3 (the next paramount release). Kind regards

Hello, can you please test iPlayer now? The problem should have been solved. Note: some slowdown will still be possible, but that could be a different problem totally unrelated to our infrastructure (attacks against BBC streaming servers will make iPlayer service extremely slow or unavailable, as it has already happened intermittently since Dec the 31st). Kind regards

Having to re-install the driver periodically is atypical. It is not what we can reproduce. It might be a different problem. Make sure that no software in your system uninstalls the driver or anyway interferes with network settings. Also scan for malware. Kind regards

Hello! Don't worry, since you had Network Lock on UPnP did not expose your system to correlations. Kind regards

Hello, the system will forward all the ports you have specified in your control port panel to the VPN IP address of each connection established by your account. If we understand your question correctly, you just need to forward remotely two ports and connect your different PCs to different VPN servers. Both ports will be forwarded to your VPN IP address on each of both servers (then you will have the applications on two PCs listening to the appropriate port on each). Note: you could even forward just one port and have the two applications on your PCs listen to the same port (assuming, again, that you connect each PC to a different VPN server). Do NOT forward ports on your router ("router" intended as a separate box outside your PCs) for this purpose. It is not only useless (because the router does not see anything about the underlying, "real" packet content, as you correctly note in another message of yours) but also would expose your system to correlation attacks. Kind regards

Good question, I connect to Air servers using the included OpenVPN client on Asuswrt Merlin with UPnP off. Are there any further precautions needed and what about those on dd-wrt, tomato or even pfsense? Note these rules (on the guide about how to forward ports in DD-WRT etc.): https://airvpn.org/topic/9270-how-to-forward-ports-in-dd-wrt-tomato-with-iptables iptables -I FORWARD -i tun1 -p udp -d destIP --dport port -j ACCEPT iptables -I FORWARD -i tun1 -p tcp -d destIP --dport port -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i tun1 -p tcp --dport port -j DNAT --to-destination destIP iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i tun1 -p udp --dport port -j DNAT --to-destination destIP Bold is ours to make the answer to your question clearer. Kind regards

Hello! 1) It's not that Network Lock "mitigates" the issue, it does solve it entirely at its root. 2) Again, this is much ado about nothing. According to our instructions, it's since 2010 that we instruct how to avoid correlations of these kinds (disable UPnP for example: 5 years ago it was already written in our proto web site). Those VPNs teams that show much concern and exploit sensationalism are just sending a message to gullible and inexperienced people. All the other persons can clearly see that this sensationalism hints to a lack of competence about the most basic and trivial routing concepts. See also this nice article, which treats so called "Port Fail" in addition to other issues (including the one treated in this thread). Another “critical” “VPN” “vulnerability” and why Port Fail is bullshit https://medium.com/@ValdikSS/another-critical-vpn-vulnerability-and-why-port-fail-is-bullshit-352b2ebd22e2#.vgjazzmz8 and how the Great ValdikSS (author of the article and probably reading us) could get (according to his own words which we feel to share) a total of 7300 USD for "such a bullshit issue" (from les incompétents, we would be tempted to add). Kind regards

Hello! We have fixed the issue. Kind regards

Hello! The forums are moderated and the following posts (if coming from not subscribed clients) are deleted before publication: - posts containing ads - posts containing clear spam (typically generated by spambots with pills ads and stuff like that) - posts containing insults, wrong information etc. or violating our netiquette (forums are meant to provide technical support on AirVPN from the community to the community) Since you are not writing from an account that has a subscription to AirVPN, maybe your post was deleted for one of the above reasons. Kind regards