go558a83nk

If you don't have your private keys, it's not only the BCC you lost, it's your main BTC balance as well. I still have my bitcoin. In an electrum wallet now. I've used it since the fork. But, my transfer from an online wallet to electrum (where I do own my keys) was just a few heights late to get bitcoin cash.

good grief, I better be on my toes this time. I lost out on some bitcoin cash by not having my own keys to my wallet.

The last few days I've tested on Ran here and there. During the day nice and fast. In evenings, (peak time) throughput to Houston Comcast customers (like me) is on the order of 40KB/s. The route to me is learned via Cogent. I know you can't do anything about that but I'm afraid you'll have some unhappy customers if this remains the case. On the other hand, Rasalgethi routes via Zayo and remains fast even during peak hours.

Is something wrong with my config that when I try to view the status page for the server to which I'm connected I get warnings of recursive routing in my openvpn log? pfsense thinks the destination is itself or something, right? It prevents me from viewing the graphs on the status page for the server.

post the log here when you're trying to connect and it doesn't connect.

if I used Eddie I'd test for you. Sorry.

Online Members: 15657 - BW: 46004 Mbit/s Really blowing up this time of day lately.

If you are using ipleak.net, are you sure you're not seeing an IPv6 address under DNS servers?

Bravo for understanding that a VPN gets you past having to forward ports on the router. Seeing that you have basic knowledge is refreshing. When you forward a port via your client area on this web site you just need to input the local port you want, 1802. However, you still may run into a problem unless the app you're using can instruct users that the external port is that which AirVPN assigns you, not 1802.

To test if the router is at fault, connect with the AirVPN software (Eddie) from a PC or something. That router should be able to do 40mbit/s. Also, make sure you're doing speed tests connected by wire. You could be seeing some degradation over wifi as well.

Sounds to me like you live in an area that's overloaded. Comcast needs to bring in more fiber and segment your area to distribute the load. This could be almost proven if a speed test outside the VPN to a local comcast speed test server also showed the slow speed during peak hours. I also have Comcast and while I'm usually able to find a situation where I can get high speed sometimes I just can't with certain servers. I think more than anything it has to do with the peer/transit providers traversed by the packets. If I find a server with a route to me that's fast I get great speeds. Hopefully you can get Comcast to do some work in your area. You might get good customer service here https://www.reddit.com/r/Comcast_Xfinity/

There certainly were some DNS problems people had after the windows 10 creators update. This forum had a few threads on fixes and workarounds.

Air servers are known for their speed so it's likely an issue of the different route taken to the Air server you're using vs the CS server you were using. Try different servers, different ports and protocols, mssfix values, and send/receive buffers.

If you live in a place where you can buy computer parts cheap you can build a machine quite suitable for running pfsense and the like for much less than a high powered consumer router costs...and yet have so much more control and the ability to run openvpn at high speed due to an AES-NI CPU. Then just use your current wifi router as an access point and control which gateway devices use on the gateway itself via NAT and Firewall rules. It's all done via a nice web GUI and there's a great guide on this forum.

Eddie is the desktop client.

On the status page click on any server name and their page will come up with use graphs and other info, such as openvpn version. I'd like to hear from you what speed increase you get. For a theoretical test, try this https://airvpn.org/topic/18322-how-to-quicly-test-theoretical-openvpn-throughput/?hl=%2Btheoretical+%2Bopenvpn+%2Bthroughput, using both AES-256-CBC (as it's written) but also AES-256-GCM.

the test on this web site?

I know pfsense can, but that's not what you're asking for I'm guessing.

yes and yes encryption/decryption is CPU intensive!

Those web sites are using MTU and 2 way ping not DPI.

How are you testing speed?

Test other ways. The test on this website seems to be biased low.

AES-256-GCM with HMAC-SHA384 for authentication with openvpn 2.4.x is in the specs page. So, does that mean we should be able to use SHA384 for auth digest? I'm just seeing this updated specs page today since I recently updated my mint machine to openvpn 2.4.3 and saw some new ciphers being used in logs. However, I can't connect with "auth sha384" in the config.

I was just about to post how I'd managed to work it out myself..I did something similar: 1. created an alias with the IP addresses I wanted to bypass the VPN 2. created outbound rules so those IPs could use the WAN (put at the bottom of the list) 3. created a firewall rule on AIRVPN_LAN where for my alias to use the WAN gateway (under advanced) not the AIRVPN_WAN gateway Ideally for 3 I would have preferred to use floating rules so I can traffic shape, but I couldn't get it to work with floating rules. One for the future Yep, Alias is the way to do it. Glad you figured it out. It's good for understanding how it all works.

Of course. This, policy routing, has been discussed plenty in this forum and in this thread in particular. Just read the previous several pages of this thread. Thanks - to save others time, check out post 71 Sorry, it wasn't as easy as I'd hoped. I went to interfaces but I couldn't see how to create another LAN interface - is this because I've only got 2 NICs? Is there a way to route non-VPN traffic with only 2 NICs? Thanks No, you don't create another interface. See this post. https://airvpn.org/topic/17444-how-to-set-up-pfsense-23-for-airvpn/?p=61027