Jump to content
Not connected, Your IP: 3.17.164.48

Staff

Staff
  • Content Count

    11340
  • Joined

    ...
  • Last visited

    ...
  • Days Won

    1948

Everything posted by Staff

  1. Yes, of course. As usual, any new Eddie version is announced in the "News and Announcement" forum. As long as Eddie 2.11.x remains beta, follow the thread pertaining to Eddie 2.11 beta. Release of the stable version will be announced in a separate thread too. We also provide RSS feed. Kind regards
  2. Error 111 means that the connection is actively refused. Packets are dropped by some firewall. Kind regards
  3. DynDns is a registered trademark of Dyn Inc. AirVPN and its DDNS have nothing to do with DynDNS and/or Dyn Inc., and we never suggest anywhere any confusion between Air DDNS or any other DDNS and the DynDNS DDNS. Names are resolved into an IP address, Ports do not have any room in any DNS record, so you need to specify the port. Always. You might be used to not doing that for web site names only because if you don't, every browser will automatically append ":80" for HTTP and ":443" for HTTPS. Kind regards
  4. Hello, Eddie 2.11.10 is not public, it's only used internally. If nothing goes severely wrong the binaries will be made public very soon. Kind regards
  5. Hello, the bug has been finally detected and fixed. You will see the fix in Eddie 2.11.10. Kind regards
  6. This will of course not work if the VM is attached to the host via NAT. To make this solution effective for the purpose make sure to bridge the VM. Kind regards
  7. @omegart Try this: remove ESET completely from your system and test again. In any case, if you decide to not remove it, do NOT use Network Lock with Windows Firewall. You can't run two competing firewalls in a system. Kind regards
  8. Hello, something is blocking UDP, please check any packet filtering tool in your system and router. If you find nothing blocking then your ISP can be culprit, switch to TCP. Kind regards
  9. Hello, please see the quote from the OpenVPN manual, reported here: https://airvpn.org/topic/3773-pls-help-strange-logs/?do=findComment&comment=3784 If UDP is not throttled in your ISP infrastructure AND your applications do not fall in the very exceptional cases that are mentioned there, you can safely prefer UDP. Kind regards
  10. Hello, https://airvpn.org/topic/20939-eddie-openvpn-24-rc2-issue-no-connection-could-be-made-because-the-target-machine-actively-refused-it/ Kind regards
  11. Hello! We're glad to inform you that we are contributing to the OSTIF project for an extensive OpenVPN 2.4 audit and bugs bounty. https://airvpn.org/mission https://ostif.org/top-ostif-donors/ Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff
  12. Hello and welcome aboard! About the syntax and logical errors in your commands please refer to appropriate manuals for your culture or curiosity. Anyway, they are not essential to resolve the problem. Now the main problem is that Eddie 2.10.3 is not compatible with Mono 4-related packages, and the Mono version required by Eddie 2.10.3 is not available in the canonical repositories of your distribution. Just upgrade to Eddie 2.11.9beta which is compatible with Mono 4 and will run fine in your distribution. If you run a desktop manager, the swiftest way to install Eddie 2.11.9beta in your Kali is downloading the .deb version (pay attention to 32 or 64 bit), right-click on the icon of the downloaded package and select "Open with" > "Installer" (or "gdebi" or any equivalent menu item). All dependencies will be resolved automatically. To download Eddie latest beta version for GNU/Linux click in our web site "Enter" > "Linux" > "Other versions" > "Experimental", select the appropriate edition and click the blue download button. See also: https://airvpn.org/topic/18625-eddie-211beta-available/ Kind regards
  13. Copyright infringements as a market failure to meet demand is a strong point supported about 10-12 years ago by Oopen Rights Group, EFF and others to a certain degree. Here comes the clash between the need of control and the revenues, because higher control on how and when and on which devices customers can "consume" a content causes lower revenues on the short term, but copyright industry (until some years ago: things are evolving) reputed that on the long term stricter control was to be preferred, as lack of control could bring to other problems (more independent creators/artists, new distribution methods, rise of new licensing methods "copyleft" etc., and rise of startup companies able to become highly competitive even with sector giants in a short time thanks to the level playing field provided by a neutral Internet). In short, losing control was (and is still to some degree) seen as long term loss of revenue due to stronger and more diversified market competition. It's not a matter of confirming our words or not, it's a matter on how to investigate so called "reality". If we agree that a scientific approach is the only acceptable way to investigate reality and build predictive models, the above quoted sentences have been falsified exactly by the studies we mentioned: a paramount purpose of statistical inference is providing/deducing one or more properties which are true when you consider the whole population (data set) and you can't falsify it with any empirical, single example (any deviation is already included in the data set from which properties derive, in a quantitative, and not qualitative, way), so the sentence is "false" (in the sense that it's an unsupported assertion/dogma falsified by currently available data). Of course, when the "population" is made of persons, behaviors, social manners, ways of living can evolve quickly, so it's important to periodically repeat studies and gather fresh data, and of course things can change in the future: it can't be ruled out that one day pirates will be worse content customers than non-pirates, but this is, to the best of our scientific knowledge, FALSE now and here ("here" = European Union and United States, where most of the studies have focused). Kind regards
  14. Hello! About option "Force all network interfaces for DNS": some people have DNS leak if unchecked, it's still under investigation. With - DNS -> DNS Switch mode - Automatic - DNS -> Check AirVPN DNS - YES - Advanced -> Ensure DNS Lock - YES - Advanced -> Force all network interfaces for DNS - YES 1) do you have ALWAYS a "The remote name could not be resolved" error, or only sometimes? 2) if you uncheck "Force all network interfaces for DNS" as explained in your topic/post, do you have ALWAYS a successful connection? In this case, after an established, successful connection, please post the log generated by "life belt" icon. It's important for us to understand if your issue is always reproducible. Thank you. Kind regards
  15. Issue: error No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 127.0.0.1:3100 when using OpenVPN 2.4 (or similar "Connection refused" error). Temporary workaround: upgrade to Eddie 2.11.x beta and add management 127.0.0.1 3100in AirVPN -> Preferences -> OVPN directives -> Custom directives In any case the issue will be fixed in the next Eddie release. EDIT: fixed in Eddie 2.11.10beta. Kind regards
  16. Movies are made to be watched, it's only fitting to let people pay for watching it since that's what a movie is there for. Otherwise, no one gets compensated for their work. ? Yes, and the most important part of people supporting them are so-called "pirates". It has been repeatedly shown in the last 12 years that so-called "pirates" are the best customers for content (especially videogames, movies and music) and that the infringements of copyright (only those for non-commercial purposes) are an essential pillar to sustain even the obsolete business model based on copyright. Just some random studies that prove the above in the last 12 years: http://copy-me.org/2015/10/ep-4-pirates-anti-piracy-artists/ http://www.webpronews.com/new-research-once-again-confirms-that-pirates-are-the-best-customers-2013-01/ https://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/07/20/2119232/suppressed-report-shows-pirates-are-good-customers etc. etc. etc. (you should be able to find about 15 different, independent studies which, with different analysis methods and different gathered data, all show a causal correlation between the act of "pirating" content and being better customers). It has also been shown in the past that "pirates" spend up to 10 more times to access content than "non-pirates" customers. Only one study (commissioned by BASCAP/TERA, so already suspected of being biased) tries to show a causal correlation between piracy and contraction of work places available in the content industry, but that study has been proved as containing two important scientific mistakes which make the study irrelevant: Piracy and Jobs in Europe: Why the BASCAP/TERA Approach is Wrong. Social Science Research Council, Nice executive summary: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/1617328605.shtml Kind regards
  17. Just downgrade to OpenVPN 2.3.13, it's the most straightforward solution. Please see here: https://airvpn.org/topic/20939-eddie-openvpn-24-issue-no-connection-could-be-made-because-the-target-machine-actively-refused-it/ Kind regards
  18. In reality it's quite simple: a pure TLS tunnel. As long as pure TLS tunnels are allowed, no problems (but note that pure TLS tunnel traffic is shaped, even heavily - that's one of the reasons why HTTPS is frequently much slower than HTTP in China residential lines). Whether a company is big or tiny does not matter because the ways to circumvent the blocks, under a technical point of view, are simple and can be achieved even by a single person in a matter of minutes with minimal monetary involvement. And note that "such a sophisticated piece of Chinese engineering" does not exist as a single piece. It's just a set of non-uniform ISP techniques, which are not even coherent between lines and zones. For example, in many residential lines in mainland China OpenVPN is disrupted, but on mobile lines it is not (you can successfully use OpenVPN in TCP most of the time, no need of double tunneling). In Shanghai less blocks than in other areas are enforced. And so on. Kind regards
  19. Hello! The problem is showed in the quoted log entry: your system can't resolve "localhost". Somehow your system hosts file has been wrongly modified, or corrupted. Please make sure that in your hosts file the first hosts block line is: 127.0.0.1 localhost How to edit hosts file in various Mac systems: https://www.tekrevue.com/tip/edit-hosts-file-mac-os-x/ Kind regards
  20. Hello! We're very glad to announce a promotion on all of our Premium plans with a 20% discount. The promotion will remain active until January the 1st, 2017, 23.59 (CET). If you're already our customer and you wish to jump aboard for a longer period, any additional subscription will be added on top of already existing subscriptions and you will not lose any day. Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff
  21. Hello! It's a bug. When the binary file exists in the Eddie directory, the custom path is ignored. Bug fixed from Eddie 2.11. You might like to upgrade to Eddie 2.11.9beta. https://airvpn.org/services/changelog.php?software=client&format=html To download latest Eddie beta version please see here: https://airvpn.org/topic/18625-eddie-211beta-available/ Kind regards
  22. Hey - thanks!Ugh, I have to do this every time I want off AirVPN? There is a bug in Eddie 2.10.3 for which DNS settings are not restored properly, not even if Eddie is shut down properly. A condition to reproduce this bug is having one or both DNS servers omitted in the network interface. Therefore, if you set the interface DNS to "automatic DNS", you will just satisfy an essential condition for the bug to come out. You have two choices to get definitively rid of the issue: 1) set BOTH DNS to publicly accessible DNS servers in your network interface while Eddie is not running (do NOT set to "Automatic") 2) upgrade Eddie to version 2.11.x beta, where this bug has been fixed AND of course always shut Eddie down properly (never kill it without grace), to give it time to restore the settings. To download Eddie latest beta version please see here: https://airvpn.org/topic/18625-eddie-211beta-available/ Kind regards
  23. Hello, maybe with Tomato or Synology you just hit the processing power limit of a core of their CPUs to encrypt/decrypt AES-256. A limit that's so near to the shaping cap of your ISP that can be confused with it. Kind regards
  24. I didn't know this. Guess I was lucky that I didn't try a 3 TiB drive, I suppose. The limit is on the boot partition only, not on the drive itself. Once the kernel runs, you can handle any other partition larger than 2 TB, but (of course) according to the limits of the filesystem of each partition. You need to take additional care if you need a dual boot BIOS machine with Linux and Windows, when you want an older than Windows 7 system (or a Linux kernel older than 2.6, really archaic), or any other system not supporting GPT partitioning (in this case, even with EFI). To clarify: https://superuser.com/questions/384807/2-1tb-limit-on-bios https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/33555/what-is-the-max-partition-supported-in-linux https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems Kind regards
  25. Hi, please see here (and if necessary continue on that thread): https://airvpn.org/topic/20750-airvpn-not-working-with-fedora-25/ Hopefully just disabling Wayland will solve the issue. Kind regards
×
×
  • Create New...