Jump to content
Not connected, Your IP: 3.145.184.113

Staff

Staff
  • Content Count

    10636
  • Joined

    ...
  • Last visited

    ...
  • Days Won

    1777

Everything posted by Staff

  1. Hello! We don't detect any problem anymore. Should you have any further issue, please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind regards
  2. Hello! We have detected a problem on Serpentis port forwarding and potentially on other servers. It is probably related to the previous backend problem (the VPN servers need to know which ports are to be dynamically forwarded to which IP address inside the VPN). While all the connections between all the servers are re-established, this problem will be solved automatically. Please let us know which server(s) you detect the problem if it's not solved within a few minutes. Kind regards
  3. Hello! Thank you very much, we're very glad and proud of this review. We would love to read the whole book as well! Can you give us the coordinates to buy the book? True, especially thanks to how OpenVPN works (if properly configured). Also, the different entry-IP and exit-IP addresses of each server prevent nasty correlation attacks against which even OpenVPN is powerless (it's not an OpenVPN fault, it's how the Internet works ). You will see a constant infrastructure expansion on various countries, some of them included in your list. We are also preparing new services which will be available in the next weeks to help people connect in countries where OpenVPN connections are disrupted. Unfortunately OpenVPN does not support XTS. In the future we will evaluate a change of cypher-system, however this is a delicate operation because it will force our clients to re-download configuration files. DD-WRT users might be forced to re-flash their router with new firmwares which implement latest OpenVPN versions. Currently AES-256-CBC, RSA 2048 bit key, double certificate authentication and TLS renegotiation provide a higher-than-military degree of security on the cypher-system side, without an excessive computational burden on older CPUs. It's true that our servers are (also) networking sharing devices. Sharing a device is a necessary prerequisite to keep a strong anonymity layer. The WIMIA test software is closed and undocumented. Currently, experts suggest that WIMIA maintainers also add IP addresses and IP ranges from dedicated servers providers on their database. Therefore there's no way to fool a WIMIA test if any person sends them one of our servers exit-IP addresses (they also have a form that can be used by snitches). This may become a problem if more and more web administrators will bar access from VPNs using WIMIA, however the more privacy awareness (as well as usage of NATs from ISPs) spread, the more this problem will heap only on those websites. We're looking forward to hearing from you. Kind regards
  4. After reading zdrifter's post I found that I use tun1 interface. I added the new iptables (except for the last line) in the firewall and saved. I still have a dns leak confirmed with http://www.dnsleaktest.com Hello! Can you please tell us which DNS servers are displayed by the dns leak test? Kind regards
  5. Hello! A backend server is a machine which works "behind the scene". No client ever communicates directly with it, but the VPN servers do for various purposes (remember, we don't keep ANY database on VPN servers for security reasons). When a backend server does not respond, the VPN server queries the next one (and so on) - a redundancy system to keep the system up even if one or more servers are down. In this case, the system worked partially when a backend server began to have problems: the website could remain up, but establishing new connections to VPN servers was not possible. We're investigating. Kind regards
  6. Hello! We have had a major problem on one of our backend servers. The problem did not affect already established connections or the website, but it did prevent new connections. The failover system worked only partially . The problem has been now fixed, however we are still working on the system so please do not hesitate to contact us for any further issue. Kind regards
  7. Hello! We have had a major problem on one of our backend servers. No attacks, no pressure from any entity (except the usual spammers, but that goes on by default ). The problem prevented new connections to our servers and has been now fixed. However, we're still working on the system in order to ascertain why the failover redundancy system worked only partially, therefore please do not hesitate to contact us for any further issue. Kind regards
  8. Hello! We have had a major problem on one of our backend servers which prevented new connections. The problem has now been fixed, can you please try again? We're still working on the system, so if you find any issue please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind regards
  9. Hello! We have had a major problem in one of our backend servers. It did not affect already established client connections but it did prevent new connections for 5 hours. The problem has been now fixed. However, we're still working on the system, so please do not hesitate to contact us for any issue. We apologize for the inconvenience. Kind regards
  10. Hello! We have had a major problem in one of our backend servers. The failover system worked only partially and we needed some time to restore everything. The problem did not affect already connected clients, but it did prevent new connections for about 5 hours. The problem has been now fixed. We're still working on the system, therefore please do not hesitate to contact us for any issue. We apologize for the inconvenience. Kind regards
  11. Hello! We're sorry, we use OpenVPN in "routing mode". The adapter, both on the server and client side, must be a TUN interface operating on layer 3, not a tap adapter handling layer 2 packets. If you use OpenVPN in bridged mode, you can't connect to Air servers. That said, it remains to be seen whether what you want achieve is possible with PPTP. Your household machine should act simultaneously as a PPTP server and OpenVPN client. Unfortunately we are not able to give you support on this and we can't say for sure if it's possible or not. However, it is definitely possible (at least on Linux) to run multiple OpenVPN instances, each running either in server or client mode, with an arbitrary number of tun interfaces, and it is also definitely possible to use a Linux box as a simultaneous OpenVPN server for its clients and an OpenVPN client for the Air servers. It is possible to do that even with just one physical network card. You will need to modify the routes pushed by our servers to your OpenVPN client, enable IP forwarding and set an appropriate routing table which allows packets routing and NATting between OpenVPN server and client. The setup requires a fairly good knowledge in networking, anyway you can be sure 100% it's possible (with only one physical network card) because we do that for services both for our clients and for internal purposes. Kind regards
  12. I changed my firmware version and was able to connect! The OpenVPN setup page on DD-WRT wouldn't accept LZO Compression set to "yes" only "adaptive". Hello! That's great, thank you for the information. Could you please specify the exact firmware version that is working with your router model? That does not necessarily mean that you have a DNS leak from your router. First please check that you really have a DNS leak here: http://dnsleaktest.com Then, please make sure that the leak is not caused by the devices connected to the router (do not force them to use different DNS servers). If the leak is confirmed, you might like to read the zdrifter post about that and more (it will prevent any leak): https://airvpn.org/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=3&id=2377&Itemid=142#2377 Kind regards
  13. Hello! The peering of our servers datacenters did not change in the last 2 weeks and the recorded performance is as high as usual. Furthermore we also added more bw redundancy. Please note that: - our NL and DE servers are in datacenters with POPs directly connected to tier1 providers with high bandwidth redundancy - you find the very same problem on different datacenters and networks - 2 weeks ago you recorded "blazing speeds" - you record high performance during the first minutes, then you lose connection or you have very high packet loss Therefore and unfortunately everything, really everything, suggests that it is a problem either of your ISP (or the ISP of your ISP etc.) or maybe of your last-mile, born during the last 2 weeks, Unfortunately, in this case, there's nothing we can do. If it was a fault on our side, we could work on it, but given the information you provided the problem is on your side and we are powerless. Just to try all the options, maybe it is not your ISP fault, but only a faulty router which shows the defect especially during tunneling (you would hardly notice dropouts without tunneling). Kind regards
  14. The log showed that I do connect but then disconnect. I tried the connection with the same configuration again with the same results. The STATE keeps showing Client:RECONNECTING. 20120912 21:06:22 I TCP connection established with 108.59.8.147:80 20120912 21:06:22 I TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef] 20120912 21:06:22 I TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: 108.59.8.147:80 20120912 21:06:22 TLS: Initial packet from 108.59.8.147:80 sid=686390b6 ba017dab 20120912 21:06:23 VERIFY OK: depth=1 /C=IT/ST=IT/L=Perugia/O=airvpn.org/CN=airvpn.org_CA/emailAddress=info@airvpn.org 20120912 21:06:23 VERIFY OK: nsCertType=SERVER 20120912 21:06:23 VERIFY OK: depth=0 /C=IT/ST=IT/L=Perugia/O=airvpn.org/CN=server/emailAddress=info@airvpn.org 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client connected from 127.0.0.1:5001 20120912 21:06:23 D MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state' 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client connected from 127.0.0.1:5001 20120912 21:06:23 D MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state' 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client connected from 127.0.0.1:5001 20120912 21:06:23 D MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state' 20120912 21:06:23 MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected 20120912 21:06:24 MANAGEMENT: Client connected from 127.0.0.1:5001 20120912 21:06:24 D MANAGEMENT: CMD 'log 500' 19700101 00:00:00 Hello! It might be a firmware problem. Can you please try to change version? Kind regards
  15. Hello! Yes, a new servers real time monitor which will provide you with more information is almost ready. Kind regards
  16. Hello! This is normal: Comodo can't know the exact range of our network zones. You can avoid this annoyance defining a network zone which covers the range 10.4.0.0->10.9.255.255. For more information please see https://airvpn.org/specs We have noticed those problems intermittently and we have partially solved them, we're still investigating. Currently you should not have any problem, neither on the website nor with servers connection. Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further issue. Kind regards
  17. Hello! uTorrent is capable to perform the correct UDP Hole Punching through our VPN servers NAT. Skype is considered to be able to do that too. This is possible because Air implemented NAT is p2p friendly, a "cone NAT" (see RFC 3489) . It "focuses" all sessions originating from a single private endpoint through the same public endpoint on the NAT. (Ford, MIT, "Peer-to-Peer Communication Across Network Address Translators", 2005). (Ford) For (a lot of) additional information please see http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat , in particular paragraphs 3.2, 3.4 and 5.1. Kind regards
  18. Hello! Thank you very much, your words are much appreciated. We are committed to providing you with an ever improving service. Kind regards
  19. Hello! Please check whether all the files inside the zipped archive have been copied and pasted into the proper directory (for example /sdcard/openvpn). Besides the .ovpn configuration file(s), you must see ca.crt, user.crt and user.key. Absence of any of those files will prevent your device to connect. In particular, absence of user.key will cause the client to prompt you for (an impossible) authentication Kind regards
  20. Hello! Can you please make sure that your ISP router is working in bridge mode? About the "Unroutable control packet received" error, it is normally due to an invalid certificate (expired or not yet valid). Please check your routers system clocks and that you have properly pasted ca.crt and user.crt. Kind regards
  21. Hello! The logs show that the connection was fully successful. Could you access the Internet from your DD-WRT connected devices ? Kind regards
  22. Hello! When Serpentis is under flood / DDoS attacks, the hardware firewall in front of it drops UDP packets [EDIT: correction, it shapes UDP traffic against flooding] in order to let Serpentis continue providing the service on TCP ports. Kind regards
  23. Hello! We don't detect any problem on any Serpentis port. All the monitoring & supervision systems show that Serpentis is up and running, listening to and accepting connections on all the designed ports. Is anybody else facing the same problem? Kind regards
  24. Hello! In general no, you should not (anyway you can change your mind whenever you wish) because in that case DNS queries and answers will be tunneled through servers, instead of resolving names directly with our DNS, with a slight performance decrease. Please note that if you wish to use Comodo DNS, you will have to force them on your TAP-Win32 adapter, because our OpenVPN servers will always push the internal DNS server IP address https://airvpn.org/specs Kind regards
  25. Hello! SSL (as well as OpenSSL) fully supports AES. Your browser will pick one of the supported encryption and key exchange systems available on your computer. By default, browsers like Firefox have RC4-40 bit disabled. Examine the airvpn.org certificate and encryption from your browser for more details. In Firefox you can enable and disable ciphersuites through the advanced settings accessible in about:config page (look at the security.* entries). You can force your browser to employ AES 256 with https, which is fully supported on our web frontend, if you prefer to connect in this way with our website. Your guess is right but maybe for the wrong reasons. However, connecting to our site when already connected to the VPN gives different advantages (bypass IP blocking, DNS poisoning, avoid mitm attacks and site forgery and prevent your ISP to see that you connect to this website). Kind regards
×
×
  • Create New...