Staff

Hello! If you use the Air client, after you have picked a server please select the "Modes" tab, pick a port and click "Enter". Please see the instructions for additional details. If you use OpenVPN directly or the OpenVPN GUI, please generate the appropriate configuration file with our configuration generator (menu "Member Area"->"Access without our client") and follow the instructions for OpenVPN for Windows. https://airvpn.org/windows Kind regards

Hello! A "lock" on bandwidth is a strong hint suggesting traffic shaping. If you notice a constant maximum bandwidth, chances are that the outbound port you're connected to is shaped by your ISP. Please try connections on different ports: 443 TCP, 80 TCP, 53 UDP to check. Kind regards

Hello! The Comodo global rules (not the application rules, of course) we recommend in order to prevent leaks do not block DNS queries from svchost.exe or from any other application. They prevent any packet to go outside your internal network, including therefore DNS queries, if and only if there is no connection to one of the Air servers. Nothing in the rules prevents to send out encrypted DNS queries in the tunnel by any application when the device is connected to an Air server. Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further information. Kind regards

Hello! From inside Castor: PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=16.5 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=16.8 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=16.8 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=16.8 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=6 ttl=51 time=17.0 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=7 ttl=51 time=16.8 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=8 ttl=51 time=17.6 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=9 ttl=51 time=17.0 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=10 ttl=51 time=17.0 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=11 ttl=51 time=17.9 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=12 ttl=51 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=13 ttl=51 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=14 ttl=51 time=16.8 ms which might hint at a problem somewhere between you and Castor, not between Castor and 8.8.8.8. Kind regards

@Someone Else Hello! Ignore the previous reply if you received it via e-mail (it did not take into consideration a different timezone). We'll further look into the issue. Kind regards

Hello! This is because you are still, really connected to the previous server. It has been possible to determine this with absolute certainty for a stroke of luck because we don't keep logs, however your account is still connected and exchanging successfully data to another server (we don't report it here for privacy). The connection to that other server began well before the time of the logs you report. So, assuming of course that you did not give your user.key to anyone, please check the disconnection procedure of your client, it seems that you think to be disconnected while in reality you are still connected. Kind regards

Hello! Speedtest can give you a relative index about which server to use, not an absolute one. Also, can you please repeat all the tests for port 443 TCP, 80 TCP and 53 UDP and publish the results, at your convenience? Thank you in advance. Kind regards

Hello! The recent attacks against the good old Draconis and the new Leporis are performed by some entity with good capacities (>3.5 Gbit/s flood, >50000 flows/s) and that also knows the entry-IP of our VPN servers (so they have been lurking in the website or subscribed to the service - not difficult for free trials, discussions in the forum etc.) . These attacks are outside the reach of most entities so we highly doubt they can be capable to bring down more than one server at a time, unless there's some very big entity behind them (very unlikely). Even in this case, the attackers were not able to sustain the attack for more than 20 minutes. Currently Leporis is ok, but we'll bring it back online at due time. And yes, Castor is back. Kind regards

Hello and thank you! So, Comodo was right since the beginning. You can see in a previous message that we detected that [AirVPN] Network Zone was wrong, and since then we assumed that you corrected it. Unfortunately you inserted a Netmask which covers almost the entire IPv4 range, authorizing your system to communicate with almost every single IP address on the Internet! The definition of the AirVPN Network Zone must be [10.4.0.0 - 10.9.255.255]. Please note the difference between "-" (IPv4 range) and "/" (CIDR NetMask). Once you have corrected the [AirVPN] Network Zone, apply the changes, bring back down the block rule below all the allow rules, re-perform the test with and without VPN. There could still be some problem, if it's the case do not hesitate to report again, we'll do our best to solve them. Kind regards

Hello! Great job! Can we see again the definition for your [AirVPN] Network Zone? Also, can you please send us the output of the command "ipconfig /all"? Kind regards

Hello! Leporis, although up and running, has suddenly lost connectivity with large parts of the Internet. We are investigating. UPDATE: Leporis is under a DDoS attack and the provider was rightly forced to null-route the targeted IP address. We will keep you posted. UPDATE: Leporis is up. Kind regards

Hello! No problems, of course you can test when you wish and when you have time. Now, there is a time-consuming test which you can perform if you wish to. Put on top only the allow rule: Allow TCP or UDP Out From MAC Any To IP 255.255.255.255 Where Source Port Is Any And Destination Port Is Any in order to allow DHCP "negotiation", reboot and check again whether you can browse (without VPN connection, always). If you can, please report. If not, move down the block rule only one line at a time, and each time check whether the connection is re-established. This will help identify which rule causes the malfunctioning. When you detect the "guilty rule", try various combinations of the already existing allow rules to determine the set of rules which are causing the leaks. Also, feel free to send us your exact Windows configuration, in order to help us reproduce your system as near as we can. Once again, please re-check that you have no other firewalls and/or antivirus running, or any other monitoring system which can run with administrator privileges and interfere with Comodo. Kind regards

@nzbob Hello! Thank you for the report. The various "xx" that are visible in the logs on the "VERIFY OK" lines have been put by you (i.e. you edited the logs) or are those the unedited logs? Does it happen only with Vega on port 443 TCP, on all Vega ports, or on every server? Kind regards

Hello! We don't provide PPTP access. Please refer to the Synology customers' support. Kind regards

Hello! We can't reproduce the behavior. Please move up your main blocking rule to the top, reboot and perform again the test. If you still have connectivity, please report to Comodo support team for major bug. Kind regards

Hello! We're sorry, as far as we know the Synology NAS is not fully compatible with OpenVPN in client mode because it does not support double certificate+key authentications. Please refer to the Synology customer support. Kind regards

Hello! This is a different problem, your TAP-Win32 adapter is inaccessible: 8/26/2012 - 9:07 PM CreateFile failed on TAP device: \\.\Global\{6EFF04E6-FB49-4CD4-9334-9DCD69EA3CA0}.tap 8/26/2012 - 9:07 PM All TAP-Win32 adapters on this system are currently in use. Please make sure that: - no other OpenVPN instances are running - the Air client is launched with administrator privileges - the TAP-Win32 adapter is enabled In order to enable the TAP-Win32 adapter: Windows XP: Open Control Panel->Network and Internet connections->Network Connections. Right-click the adapter "TAP-Win32 Adapter V9" and select Enable. Windows Vista: Open Control Panel->Network and Internet->Network and Sharing Center->Manage network connections. Right-click the TAP-Win32 Adapter and select Enable. Windows 7: Open Control Panel->Network and Internet->Network and Sharing Center->Change Adapter Settings. Right-click the adapter TAP-Win32 Adapter and select Enable. Kind regards

Hello! We're sorry, we don't know Shakespeer. Does it have configurable listening ports? Kind regards

Hello! Forget momentarily about application rules, the previous suggestion was misleading, we apologize for the inconvenience. First of all, please perform a basic test: put your Comodo firewall to "Custom Policy", then reboot your system. Please let us know whether you have Internet connectivity just after the reboot (do not connect to the VPN). Kind regards

Hello! We're glad to know that the problem is solved. Please do not hesitate to warn us if the problem occurs again, so that we can check to understand what really happens. Kind regards

Hello! Did you set any application rule? When Comodo evaluates the rules, for incoming connections the global rules take precedence over the application rules. For outgoing connections, on the contrary, application rules take the precedence on global rules. In the case of web browsers, they don't need an incoming connection, because they establish an outgoing TCP connection and communicate through the established socket. MISLEADING: the global rules will be evaluated anyway after the application rules. Please check that you don't have application rules, especially that Chrome is not a trusted application or is anyway authorized to establish outgoing connections. In case of any doubt, please do not hesitate to send us a screenshot of your application rules. EDIT: The recommendation is wrong, sorry. Although application rules take precedence over global rules for outgoing packets, this is an evaluation precedence only. No application rule can jump to "accept" before the global rules are also evaluated. So an outgoing connection must pass both the application rules and the global rules to be established. Therefore, this can't be the problem. Chances are that some other firewall or antivirus is interfering with Comodo. Kind regards

Hello! The 11% of Chrome (or any other application) is normal. All the applications will communicate with the outside, but passing through the tunnel, except OpenVPN. However, Comodo will correctly display the percentage on the total communications, on any network card. So that 11% refers to communications of Chrome to/from your TAP-Win32 card AND/OR to/from airvpn.org. Important: when you disconnect from the VPN your applications will be anyway authorized to communicate with airvpn.org (and with the VPN servers specified entry-IP addresses, of course), according to the global rules. This is to allow the Air client to connect. If you don't like this behavior, you can delete the allow rules for 46.105.19.36, and connect via OpenVPN directly or via the OpenVPN GUI, which don't need to contact airvpn.org. You can perform a quick check even without tools like Wireshark. Open the Comodo "View Active Connections" while you're connected to the VPN, and check that all the applications, except openvpn.exe, are connecting from 10.*.*.*. If some application is connecting from 192.168.*.* (assuming this is your home network zone) to the outside world, then there's something wrong. Then, disconnect the VPN and check that the only communications comply with the global rules. For example, try to open with Chrome any website except airvpn.org, you should be unable to reach it. We're looking forward to hearing from you. Kind regards

Hello! You need to copy the content of the zip archive. The ca.crt, user.crt and user.key files are always the same. "You can put more than one .ovpn or .conf file together with its key and/or certificate files into the ~/Library/Application Support/Tunnelblick/Configurations folder. Tunnelblick interprets each .ovpn or .conf file in the ~/Library/Application Support/Tunnelblick/Configurations folder as a configuration file for a different connection; each of the connections will be available in the drop down menu and shown as a separate tab in the "OpenVPN Log” window. " http://code.google.com/p/tunnelblick/wiki/UsingTunnelblick#Using_More_than_One_VPN_Connection Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further information. Kind regards

Hello! The global rules look fine, there are just some duplicates but they are inessential, for example the following three rules are the same according to your Network Zones configuration: Allow IP In/Out From IP In [10.4.0.0 -10.9.255.255] To MAC Any Where Protocol Is Any Allow IP In/Out From In [AirVPN] To MAC Any Where Protocol Is Any Allow IP In/Out From MAC Any To In [AirVPN] Where Protocol Is Any Anyway, this is not the cause of the problem. The blocks you can see in Comodo logs are ok. Please make sure that the Comodo firewall security policy is set to "Custom Policy" and that you don't have any other firewall running. Please close all your applications (close browsers, disconnect from VPN etc.), set Comodo to "Custom Policy", reconnect to the VPN, start normal Internet activity then disconnect from the VPN and check that you don't have anymore connectivity outside your local network. We're looking forward to hearing from you. Kind regards

@jasonc Hello! We have just checked that your account is authorized to access all the servers and we don't detect any problem with it. Please note that an account can connect only to one server at the same time. You can switch servers as many times as you wish, but you can't be connected to two or more servers simultaneously. Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further support. Kind regards