Leaderboard

Hello! We're very glad to inform you that two new 10 Gbit/s full duplex servers located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, are available: Taiyangshou and Vindemiatrix. The AirVPN client will show automatically the new servers; if you use any other OpenVPN or WireGuard client you can generate all the files to access them through our configuration/certificates/key generator (menu "Client Area"->"Config generator"). The servers accept connections on ports 53, 80, 443, 1194, 2018 UDP and TCP for OpenVPN and ports 1637, 47107 and 51820 UDP for WireGuard. They support OpenVPN over SSL and OpenVPN over SSH, TLS 1.3, OpenVPN tls-crypt and WireGuard. Full IPv6 support is included as well. As usual no traffic limits, no logs, no discrimination on protocols and hardened security against various attacks with separate entry and exit-IP addresses. You can check the status as usual in our real time servers monitor : https://airvpn.org/servers/Taiyangshou https://airvpn.org/servers/Vindemiatrix Do not hesitate to contact us for any information or issue. Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff

I also extended my subscription for one year. Easily the best VPN on the market and no other competitor gets even close. Thanks AirVPN staff!

I think you will find after some more experimentation that, if you type in www.reddit.com, the HTTP code you get back is actually 302, a redirect to HTTPS. Which is correct and corresponds with best practices for HTTPS redirects. Typing in https://www.reddit.com instead will yield the correct result. It doesn't help that the route checker deems those redirects as errors, too, and so colors the cell's background red, so I agree in so far as one of two things could happen to remedy this: The background color should be yellow to indicate a redirect which doesn't have to be a block. But that tool is actually there to tell you "yep, works" or "nope, not from here" at a glance. Yellow as in "meh, maybe, check yourself" is beyond unhelpful. If a web server returns a 301 or 302, follow the Location header once to cater to the common case of a HTTPS redirect and print the result for that new URL. But this could produce false positive results: If a website viewed from the server returns a 302 to a webpage basically saying "sorry, you've been blocked", that webpage will of course have a green 200 return code. What a sweet dream. Check out OneDrive/Outlook, Netflix, Hulu, BBC iPlayer, etc. and maybe all those sites sitting behind a Sucuri WAF. What you could do is to keep track of the Blocked websites warning forum and update your list with every new thread and post. It'd be a help, but would demand work from you alone, continuously even. But if effective, such as thread could be pinned in this forum for visibility and be a boon for the community, I'm sure.

Hello AirVPN Staff and others. I would very much like to have an API call for creating and removing port forwardings, including requesting a random port. This would allow users to have a different port open for every session started. Setting up a port to be forwarded is already pretty simple, but it does still require having a web browser running and logging in to Air. This may be a small obstacle, but an obstacle nonetheless. I strongly suspect many people will set up a port forwarding only once, and then using the same port for all future sessions, and this has some negative implications for privacy. It is already possible to have this functionality when talking to Air's web server through a browser and clicking buttons manually, so I'm making the assumption it will not be too difficult to do the same through an official HTTP-based API. Does this make sense? I'd love to hear what you think.