Leaderboard

Provide sub-regions for US region, perhaps useast.airvpn.org, uscentral.airvpn.org, and uspacific.airvpn.org? This will minimize latency on games that try to connect you to the closest server by having your exit ip to be in the same area. Manually managing the different local region servers is a pain when some are offline while others have high packet loss. It would be nice to be connected to the best performing local region server and not the one across the country.

Hello! We're very glad to inform you that a new 10 Gbit/s full duplex server located in Zurich, Switzerland, is available: Alpherg. The AirVPN client will show automatically the new server; if you use any other OpenVPN or WireGuard client you can generate all the files to access it through our configuration/certificates/key generator (menu "Client Area"->"Config generator"). The server accepts connections on ports 53, 80, 443, 1194, 2018 UDP and TCP for OpenVPN and ports 1637, 47107 and 51820 UDP for WireGuard. Alpherg supports OpenVPN over SSL and OpenVPN over SSH, TLS 1.3, OpenVPN tls-crypt and WireGuard. Full IPv6 support is included as well. As usual no traffic limits, no logs, no discrimination on protocols and hardened security against various attacks with separate entry and exit-IP addresses. You can check the status as usual in our real time servers monitor by clicking the names of the servers. Do not hesitate to contact us for any information or issue. Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff

Hello! New all-time high! Kind regards

Web developer here. I restore websites for Protoweb, and have created websites for different generations of browser engines. This definitely isn't a 90s site, lol. I quite like the coat of paint it has. Skeuomorphic design language in this day and age is refreshing to see, particularly with how dull many websites look now. CSS here seems to condense the page down for narrow phone screens, which is nice. Just my 2 cents 😃

I don't care in what Beta it's implemented and in what version and for how long it's being tested. The request is for a stable release and it should be in a stable release. Is releasing a Windows application up-to-par with the base requirements too much to ask for? Is this seriously the general consensus here? What utter trash. Good to know the experimental version is considered safe for use but it's still labeled as experimental. And the experimental release is not available on WinGet so it still doesn't solve the problem! Please don't view this as a personal attack OpenSourcerer, I very much appreciate your fast and detailed response. Seems like we're on the same cynical page here regarding AirVPN's development and releases of this application. Any idea on how we could initiate a change?