Leaderboard

Hello! We're glad to inform you that all VPN servers are now connected to 1 Gbit/s or 10 Gbit/s full duplex lines and their hardware can use the full available bandwidth, even thanks to software optimization, load balancing and widespread WireGuard usage. To reflect project completion we have modified the real time servers monitor accordingly. https://airvpn.org/status The displayed throughput is again the sum of the total throughput (up+down bandwidth) as usual, but the total available bandwidth is the total up+down bandwidth which the server is, from now on, really capable to use. As usual, if you need a more detailed overview, including stats, history and distinction of up and down bandwidth, you can click the server name. Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff

@Staff @arteryshelby @revsplus Mullvad does the same. It publishes 20 Gbit/s for 10 Gbit/s full duplex l., 2 Gbit/s for 1 Gbit/s full duplex and 1 Gbit/s for 500 Mbit/s l. It's normal and appropriate to me. AirVPN finally patches the "inconsistency" affecting the monitor ever since... always. Quick OT: Mullvad shrunk recently the amount of servers. From 769 servers a few months ago, to 666 (Holy Moly, the number of the Beast!!!). Just seen today. Wondering whether it comes from the deletion of port forwarding... Disclaimer: I don't want to compare Mullvad embryonic and undeveloped monitor with AirVPN interstellar monitor, me don't want to offend nobody. 😁

Hello! OK, and please let the community help us understand what customers care about, and let us decide accordingly, especially when hundreds of them asked for this modification. Kind regards

Hello! AzireVPN uses our new method, we see now from their stats. They show bandwidth in and bandwidth out of each server. They don't have graphs, stats by time periods and a ton of other features we offer, but they still show up + down ("in" + "out" in their monitor). Note how it's not symmetrical, showing once again that your solution was indeed inapplicable. For example in this moment they declare that a server in France uses 1200 Mbit/s "in" and 109 Mbit/s "out". They also write: "Each server is connected with two 1 Gbit/s links towards the switch." In iVPN,, oh well... that would be a server monitor in your opinion?! It's a list of servers with a percentage, no stats, no graphs, no history, no nothing... We can't see any provider offering a server monitor like ours. To the best of our knowledge this is a very exclusive feature of AirVPN. So we can't name any simply because nobody has it. But Azire (you mentioned it) adopts the same solution by publishing "in" and "out" flow. As shown by your own Azire example, it wouldn't be accurate. That's of course false. You may have asymmetries which make this quoted statement false. Even a scriptkiddie modest flood counts significantly, in this case, either inside the VPN, or incoming from outside the VPN itself. Publishing raw data as they are is the most reliable way, it's the way recommended by an important amount of community members, and it does not require data manipulation. By clicking the name of the server in our real time server monitor you can still see the distinction of bandwidth "up" and "down" of course, that feature, together with the graphs, remain. Kind regards

Bravo! That's how you do it. By preserving what was advertised to all previous customers you have proved your honesty and fairness again. 👏