Leaderboard

@OpenSourcerer Hello! It must be seen how nm-ovpn handles DNS push. Historically, it has always been able to properly accept DNS push and then restore previous settings at the end of the connection. However, a double-check in those systems which run systemd-resolved configured in on-link mode and /etc/resolv.conf bypass (example: Fedora 33 by default settings) would be safer, you never know. In other systems where the global DNS is preserved and nameservers are "decided" by /etc/resolv.conf it appears that nm-ovpn properly handles DNS push, no DNS leaks are possible. A more general approach when you don't know which configuration you might encounter is (on top of usual network lock rules) blocking, via firewall, packets (both TCP and UDP) to port 53 of the router address, to prevent that local queries can be forwarded by the router in clear text to some other nameserver, potentially the ISP DNS server (it would not be a DNS leak, because the system does what you tell it to do, but the outcome is anyway a query out of the tunnel). Kind regards

Happy Birthday, guys! 🎂🎉

Happy birthday AirVPN. Everyone at AirVPN Staff, big thumbs up for your stellar achievement! Best VPN there is 💯

My plan expires in 18 days, but I just extended it by 3 years. Thank you AirVPN!