Jump to content
Not connected, Your IP: 216.73.216.27

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Today
  3. The last version that worked without being sluggish or suffered slow GUI was 2.22.2 but that had a problem in the with Eddie window open, the kde application launcher would not stay open at the same time. I have just initiated Eddie to run through terminal so I could see it load, this was in the first line or the output: $ eddie-ui (eddie-ui:26517): Gtk-WARNING **: 10:32:05.005: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "adwaita", . 2026.02.07 10:32:05 - Eddie version: 2.24.6 / linux_x64, System: Linux, Name: Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS, Version: 24.04.3 LTS (Noble Numbat), Framework: 6.8.0.96 (tarball Wed Jan 15 10:20:48 UTC 2020); Framework: v4.0.30319 This is the Linux version I use: Kubuntu Operating System: Kubuntu 24.04 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.12 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.115.0 Qt Version: 5.15.13 Kernel Version: 6.8.0-90-generic (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11
  4. Close Eddie, reopen and try a connection, then provide a system report. It's interesting that you noticed all the troubleshooting attempts, but not the very first thing that is usually asked: The request for more information..
  5. Thank you for the update - is there going to be new version of the Eddie any time soon?
  6. I also find the Eddie ui a bit sluggish - I wonder when there will be a updated version or a different client altogether. It is a shame because Windows Eddie is so smooth and fast overall and Android client is just superb, perhaps the Linux-desktop client is not a high priority any more.
  7. Yesterday
  8. Hello! I recently purchased AirVPN for the first time [Windows 11, installed using the x64 installer], and I'm not able to connect to any servers due to a reoccuring 'WireGuard>Handshake timeout' error. I've tried restarting my PC, updating drivers, connecting to different servers and countries (U.S. Canada, the Netherlands) I deleted another vpn program I had (Radmin VPN), which did nothing. I tried changing the WireGuard settings (First to 1280, then Omit). This did nothing either. I tried installing another VPN, Proton, and I was able to connect with that service. However, I'd prefer AirVPN as I already paid for it and Proton's free plan blocks certain features I'm looking for. I'm not sure what troubleshooting steps to try next--I've looked at other forum posts and tried what I could. The only thing I haven't tried is using an Ethernet cord...Because I don't own one. Any help is much appreciated!
  9. Most of the encryption algorithms are handled by hardware, using CPU extensions. But packet switching still requires vanilla CPU power. So yeah, CPU horsepower still required but not as much as the days of old. Also the newer, more efficient ciphers help a lot as well.
  10. Can confirm the same. Sometimes the download speeds also drop off the cliff.
  11. I'd like to upvote this but also expand upon, a little bit: Rerouting only servers for geolocation workaround sound like a very good compromise vs full-blown servers. So it would be nice to see rerouting servers in "popular" locations that a full server deployment is not justified. Usecases have already been mentioned (IPTV, government sites, banking etc). Another option might be that geoblocking could be worked around via DNS? I have seen some DNS-only services accomplishing the above. Just not sure how
  12. With 300+ users you would need some beefy CPUs in the server. I would guess that is the bottleneck, not the actual connection. VPNs are encrypted and require the processing power to handle the number of users connected. Not sure what their server specs actually are, but would be curious to know.
  13. Last week
  14. Alruba is usually a fast server for me, but recently something has changed. I still get fast download speeds but the upload is barely 10Mbps in speedtest.net and this is noticeable elsewhere too. Alruba's load has often been almost 100% but now it is only 15-25% at the time of writing, so maybe I'm not the only one having issues.
  15. Hello! The "range" is specified by mask /32, so it's this single unique address. Yes, it's plausible that some past event flagged the IP address. We don't know the internals of Tailscale but definitely this behavior should be investigated. Why an attempted connection to this specific IP address and why this port? Kind regards
  16. According to the link in my first post, the entire range is flagged at Malwarebytes due to some adresses has been related to troians at one point. But nice to know nothing listens on that port, makes little sense to me
  17. Hello! There's nothing listening to port 54037 on any AirVPN server. We can't see why Tailscale seeks a connection to it, anyway we are sure now that there's no malware there as there's nothing. Probably Malwarebytes behavior comes from some past event or it's yet another over-blocking case. Kind regards
  18. Hello Staff, thank you for heads up! I will revert to MTU 1420. Regards
  19. the effective MTU of the tunnel is limited by the smallest MTU anywhere along the path Hello! On our servers the MTU limit is 1420 bytes on a standard Ethernet frame because of IPv6 over IPv4. For PPPoE see also https://www.hitoha.moe/wireguard-mtu-over-pppoe/ So, if you set 1432 bytes MTU for your WireGuard interface, the fragmentation will occur on our servers, not on your side. The upper, actual limit is the lowest MTU in the path, in other words the smallest MTU on the path silently limits the tunnel. The 12 bytes difference may be negligible and most packets will not be fragmented, and you will not see fragmentation on your side, but you could notice a performance hit on upload (upload from you to the server we mean). Kind regards
  20. The program is tailscale and the port is 54037 in this case 🙂 I do have an Netherlands AirVpn server setup as an tailscale exit node, but this pc does not use any exit nodes.
  21. Choose a different server? Not the answer. Using the Atlanta Georgia Wireguard config, I'm blocked on https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/02/03/badnas/ https://forums.spacerex.co/top Moving to the Miami Wireguard config, I'm blocked on https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/02/03/badnas/ DNS Leak test IP: 193.37.252.99 looks fine. FWIW, I'm using a web FoxyProxy on Firefox for these connections. There must be a better way than whac-a-mole. Advice?
  22. The download links are all there now, problem solved!
  23. Hello, just to share my experience, I am on PPPoE, MTU 1492 since my ISP doesn't support baby jumbo frames. I have 4 WG tunnels managed by my pfSense appliance. WG interfaces have MTU 1432 (only ipv4 traffic) and I don't see any fragmentation when I ping test from those WG interface. I had in the past MTU 1412 but recently I wanted to test exactly the MTU before fragmatation accurs and that value is 1432.
  24. Hello! Problem solved, can you please try again now? Kind regards
  25. @Zack Hello! The IP address you mention is assigned to AirVPN server Asellus in the Netherlands. Please mention explicitly port Y, we want and must verify what your app (mention the app too if possible) will find on that port, it's important. Kind regards
  26. Hello and thank you for having reported the problem! We are working on it. We will update this thread when the issue is solved. Kind regards
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...