Let me just add the observation that only a few percent of domains you might be looking up in a DNS system are going to be DNSSEC signed anyway. While it's nice to have DNSSEC functioning as a sort of future proofing and for the rare cases when it matters now, becoming alarmed at its absence in a DNS system at this stage is seriously inappropriate. Example: in the US the only major financial institution that I can find that signs its DNS entries with DNSSEC is the Internal Revenue Service! Yes, irs.gov is signed, as are some other US-gov't agency sites. But the big banks do not use DNSSEC, and neither do the well-known large brokerage houses. (Every site foo.bank is a DNSSEC-signed bank site, but see https://www.register.bank/dotBANKers/# to see which banks have bothered. They're all small.) In the VPN world, AirVPN.org is signed, mullvad.net is signed, and privateinternetaccess.com is signed. Every other well-known VPN service that I've tried depends on unsigned DNS entries. So basically at present, DNSSEC from the consumer point of view is little more than a cute toy.