Leaderboard

Quite perplexed by the use of the wg protocol, to be honest. I can say that I saw good speeds with a debian iso but that was something out of the ordinary. IVPN, a provider praised for their speeds, has been nothing but a bummer for me. Torrents are around 7MB/s and with another I am at 20 MB/s. On IVPN I used wg and on the other it was ovpn. But I cannot say that I don't understand the hype that wg goes through. But for me it is ovpn all the way. If you look at all the security issues and how providers are supposedly "fixing" them, I can only walk around with a huge question mark over my head. Why's wg needed anyway? What can it do that ovpn cannot do for us privacy minded folks? Why "fix" it when ovpn is still working as intended and always has? Surely, you wouldn't try to apply the use-case of an Volkswagen to an F1 car. With that said, I always liked AirVPN's approach to wg and that AirVPN kept prioritizing ovpn over wg. Anyway, everybody can do as he likes, I for one will stick to ovpn in the meantime.

On my 350 line, I'm getting 200mbit/sec over encrypted vpn tunnel. Try the following... Preferences > Protocols ... set it to 'SSL 443' or 'Automatic' Preferences > Networking ... set both send/receive buffers to '256' or '512 KB' Preferences > OVPN directives ... insert 'mssfix 1442' as Custom command Save these settings and reconnect. Also, what is the CPU processor's spec on on your computer? Computer's CPU matters for speeds over encrypted tunnel.