Jump to content
Not connected, Your IP: 3.148.108.144
AirVPN

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Sauromayne Sauromayne joined the community ...
  3. ViktorRu39 ViktorRu39 joined the community ...
  4. 91a970 91a970 joined the community ...
  5. ttxq ttxq joined the community ...
  6. olygekvipe olygekvipe joined the community ...
  7. admin345 admin345 joined the community ...
  8. k.r k.r joined the community ...
  9. Yerity24 Yerity24 joined the community ...
  10. Today
  11. adorabyul adorabyul joined the community ...
  12. Donut6738 Donut6738 joined the community ...
  13. OpenSourcerer
    I would always test the performance of whatever I want to perform over VPN, where it's supposed to perform. To give an example, if I want quick Steam downloads, test the servers with a Steam download. Speedtests, as you probably noticed, depend quite a bit on the server the speedtest software selects. Take them with heaps of salt and always test under real workloads.
  14. Kunuyana
    So for you both work fine... weird. I redid the speedtests on Alphard multiple times now, always perfect speed. Maybe it's some incompatibility elsewhere, but it's definitely not a ISP block or router-hardware issue, otherwise all servers would be slow. The one difference I spotted is that one is by "PhoenixNAP Global IT Services" and the slow one by Labixe Ltd. Do you think that could matter?
  15. OpenSourcerer
    It looked interesting at first. This is Alphard via OpenVPN, this time on my tower (with a 2.5 GbE port, whereas my ThinkPad was a 2.5 GbE port via Thunderbolt 3). 75% down, close to 100% up. $ speedtest-cli Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from Global Layer (213.152.187.200)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Cronon GmbH (Berlin) [574.80 km]: 10.665 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 775.45 Mbit/s Testing upload speed...................................................................................................... Upload: 241.62 Mbit/s But then I did Crater via OpenVPN. $ speedtest-cli Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from Global Layer (213.152.162.15)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Cronon GmbH (Berlin) [591.18 km]: 10.014 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 897.43 Mbit/s Testing upload speed...................................................................................................... Upload: 246.82 Mbit/s 89% down, 100% up.
  16. Kunuyana
    Hey So I just did some more tests when looking up the Fritzbox and with "Alphard" I suddenly got perfect speeds (the 300mbit test). Then I tried out Crater again and got the low speed result. This would mean that it is not a router-hardware issue after all though? But a VPN server issue, right?
  17.    Spanky24 reacted to a post in a topic: speedtest comparison ...
  18.    Spanky24 reacted to a post in a topic: speedtest comparison ...
  19.    nestegg101 reacted to a post in a topic: Is A Website Blocked? Then Check This Guide First [Feedback Appreciated] ...
  20. Staff
    Hello! If Network Lock is enabled it must be an Eddie display problem. It's odd because it was not observed before and the data should come directly from system tools measuring the tun throughput. We will investigate, in the meantime you are safe, no traffic is going outside the VPN tunnel, provided that Network Lock is engaged (and that no administrator modifies system's firewall rules, obviously). Kind regards
  21. Emanuelshorb started following [EE] Alruba server IP addresses change ...
  22. Yesterday
  23. Octopilion
    It started doing it again. when i initially started the download it seemed to be working properly but as it continued on it Eddie showed a 50 MBps discrepancy and then 3 minutes later it jumped back up to match what Steam was showing. Now it keeps fluctuating with actually speeds and half of what's actually happening. I'm using Task Manager to monitor and i can clearly see the discrepancies. I'm ok with the speeds being capped as most vpns do but the fact that not all the data is going through the vpn is weird to me.
  24. OpenSourcerer
    Fritz!Box 5590. But a 5530 is also sufficient if money is a factor. Network Lock is only implemented in AirVPN software. Others are building their own firewall rules for whichever system/firewall combo they're using: Windows Firewall Control, ufw on Linux, pf on *BSD and others.
  25. skynet666 skynet666 changed their profile photo ...
  26. Staff
    Hello! We're sorry, we do not compile lists, we offer third-party selected ones. Please contact the list's author at your convenience. Kind regards
  27. Kunuyana
    Hey, so I checked all the settings and there are only the standard ones. Port control, power usage for wlan, ipv6 reset times, things like that. May I ask what router you are using? I could buy that one too And might there be a software aside from Eddie that could work better? What's important for me is this network lock feature so all apps use the VPN
  28.    Kunuyana reacted to a post in a topic: Fiber Connection & Low VPN Performance ...
  29. matmat started following airvpn.org mobile experience ...
  30. matmat
    Hi, Any plans for modernization of the website? It looks like it's from the 90s. And some functionality is not working well on mobile (e.g. clicking force disconnect on an active session). Thanks.
  31. WowSuchSpeed
    There is www.aukro.cz and aukro.cz in AirVPN Porn / NSFW list. There is no porn or NSFW content whatsoever on this site. It is very popular local auction server and selling "NSFW items" is prohibited. Can you remove this site from your NSFW list, please? There are many more hugely popular local sites that were added by mistake and contain no NSFW content: iprima.cz, blog.cz, edisk.cz, edisk.eu, edisk.live, edisk.sk, bestmusic.cz, kafe.cz, kinobox.cz, biorezonance-trutnov.cz I believe these sites were adopted from Chad Mayfield list
  32. Staff
    Hello! We see that the packets are correctly sent to your node on every port but either they get a TCP RST or no reply is received, except for one port (we presume the one that you report as working). We confirm no problems on the server side. On top of the mentioned check list please review again the firewall rules and/or disable any anti-malware or packet filtering tool for a quick test. Kind regards
  33. purplebored
    I for now only tried using soulseekqt and qbittorrent it works with the one open port but the other two don't work with it. I also tried checking if the port is open on your website and I tried a third party website too. Like I said in my initial post there is one port working it's just the fact that all those other don't want to work.
  34. Staff
    Hello! No problems are reported on the CH and SE servers and everything appears just fine. What are the listening programs? Kind regards
  35. purplebored
    Hello, the problem exists on the Latvian, swiss, and swedish servers. I tried new wireguard keys, I even attempted to use OpenVPN. I will attempt later to once again create new wireguard keys I doubt something any tool is blocking them as I checked those ports on windows Linux and android.
  36. cla
    same here on macOs sequoia 15.1.1 no Wireguard under Protocols
  37. Staff
    Hello! We have checked from inside the VPN server you're currently connected to, and the ports are forwarded properly, but by trying to reach your system through the proper ports we always get an almost immediate connection refused. Can you please test different servers and check whether the problem appears on specific servers? If so, can you please give us the list of servers and then add a new WireGuard key and test again with the new key? If the above does not solve the problem, let's go back to the basic check list. Please make sure that: the listening programs are really running and listening to the correct ports the listening programs do not bind to the physical network interface, or any other wrong interface (if a bind option is available in the listening program settings) the listening programs have been launched after the VPN connection had been established successfully no packet filtering tool or antimalware tool block packets to or from the listening programs Kind regards
  38. Staff
    Hello! Yes, the server has been deployed and connected, its system has been installed and we are testing it. If no problems arise during the tests we will make it available very soon. Kind regards
  39. GSD925 GSD925 changed their profile photo ...
  40. purplebored started following New ports aren't open ...
  41. purplebored
    Hi, I have 3 ports open currently and only one of them is working I tried deleting them and generating new ones but it doesn't seem to work. I just get a "Connection timed out (110)" and "Connection refused (111) ". I tried searching the forums for people with those issues but couldn't find a post. If there is a post about that issue then sorry for the duplicate. I would really appreciate some help with this issue. Best regards, purplebored
  42. go558a83nk started following [CH] Server replacement ...
  43. go558a83nk
    Can we still expect a new server soon? The 25th came and went.
  44. Last week
  45. Octopilion
    I had engaged wireguard on the previous version and it seemed to have done the trick. I've uninstalled everything and installed the beta version and will see if i see discrepancies in the future. So far so good. Thanks allots for the support.
  46. OpenSourcerer started following Triangulum - IP Blacklisted? ...
  47. OpenSourcerer
    .
  48. Staff
    Hello! We post the reply to your ticket by the support team for the reader's comfort. ==== Hello and thank you for your choice! We do not think that the problem can be approached and resolved through OpenVPN configuration files. We would consider policy based routing on the router. In this way you can configure each specific device behind the router to have its traffic routed through the proper tun interface or even through the WAN (outside the VPN, therefore). Please check the documentation. An overview of the Policy Based Routing (PBR) utility: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/routing/pbr A specific approach to achieve the setup: https://search.brave.com/search?q=openwrt+policy+routing+for+multiple+OpenVPN+client+connections&summary=1&conversation=f943dbcf532434cd689c65 Kind regards AirVPN Support Team ==== Kind regards
  49. Staff
    @starl1te Hello! The problem should be Tegmen specific. We have now brought down the server to investigate. Please connect to any other server. Kind regards
  50. starl1te
    After almost a year without issues, a couple days ago I started getting Auth Failed loop (absolutely no changes to my system or Eddie settings). When clicking "Connect to a recommended server" it connects ONLY to Tegmen-Canada (used to be a different random server each time), and auth fails. No clue where to "look at the client area to discover the reason". I installed the experimental version and the "auth failed" is fixed but it still selects ONLY Tegmen as recommended. Going back to ver 2.21.8, default (reset) settings - same problem, Tegmen auth failed. Any idea how I can return to the recommended server button actually selecting a working recommended server - Tegmen is VERY slow compared to every other Canadian server I tried. Eddie_20241126_132458.txt
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...