Not connected, Your IP: 216.73.217.81
Online: 42630 users - 462929 Mbit/s total BWAll Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
-
-
-
-
- Today
-
-
-
-
-
- Yesterday
-
-
What a welcome surprise to see Zuboff cited as a bibliography entry in a VPN forum. “Surveillance capitalism’s development is best understood as part of a broader contest with the democratic order—the only institutional framework that poses an existential threat. The democratic order retains the legitimate authority to contradict, interrupt, and abolish surveillance capitalism’s foundational operations. Its distinctive advantages include the power to inspire action and the necessary authority to make, impose, and enforce the rule of law.”, she says in a known essay linked by the Staff. Once you disrupt the democratic order’s operations and replace operations of public interest/government body competence with corporate operations, the existential threat disappears. Yet another compelling reason to oppose the delegation of age verification and ID card databases build-up to private companies. Big corps need governments strong enough to protect their properties and any menace from "we, the people", but weak enough to be corruptible and manipulated... 😪 Always, Seeyabye!
-
Not to be cringe, but the US pricing for bundles on Raid are a lot cheaper than UK, because they are priced exactly the same, but the convertion makes it a lot cheaper for UK users to transfer their account to the US and buy them. Example attached. The issue is, Plarium is detecting my VPN. Any suggestions on a potential fix? My first time trying to use my VPN like this, so I am surprised it's an issue, but I suppose if the IP addresses are registered to AirVPN, or there is a known list of their IPs that is being tracked it may be causing the issue
-
-
Hello! Since OpenVPN and WireGuard fail too, this is not an Eddie-specific problem. However, an Eddie system report could help us understand what goes wrong. Please see here to send a system report generated by Eddie: Kind regards
-
Hello! Of course. Eddie offers a GUI with a one-click connection button, but the case of firewalld is so special to be a very rare exception requiring manual intervention by the system administrator. We can't allow Eddie to manipulate your system in such a profound way. Note that Eddie will work anyway, but you can't use Network Lock to prevent leaks, because firewalld takes exclusive ownership of the firewall rules (Network Lock is based on firewall rules). And after all, do not underestimate yourself. The steps to fix the situation are very simple and "once and for all". Let's break the steps down: 1. Open a terminal (aka shell or Console or Konsole) from your Desktop Environment 2. Type the following command: sudo nano /etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf 3. You are now inside the "nano" editor, editing the firewalld configuration file with administrator (root) privileges. Move with the cursor arrow keys between the options and enter the following line: NftablesTableOwner=no make sure you press ENTER at the end of the line (so the line stays alone between all the other options, anywhere). 4. Save the file by pressing CTRL + O (keep CTRL pressed, and type O) 5. Exit the editor by pressing CTRL + X 6. Restart firewalld with the command (on the terminal): sudo systemctl restart firewalld Kind regards
-
Hello! Good catch. Large corporations and conglomerates are often wealthier, faster and much more efficient than most or all government bodies. Shifting the surveillance role to private entities serves a dual purpose: to address the incompetence and lack of funding in public institutions, ravaged by decades of malpractice and corruption, and to increase the profits of conglomerates both directly and indirectly. Surveillance raises the cost of dissent, pushes self-censorship, reduce participation in protests etc. The key issue is not merely whether surveillance exists, but who controls it, how it is regulated, and whether there are effective checks on its abuse. Once surveillance is mainly up to conglomerates and judicial overview is weak or absent, it works in tandem with other capabilities of the conglomerates themselves: control of platforms, restriction on opposition and competitors, restrictions against political parties not supporting laws favorable for the conglomerates purposes. This has already happened multiple times and probably the more you give surveillance roles to large corporations, the more it will occur and possibly in more covert manners. And yes, this is clearly proven by Shoshana Zuboff's work you mentioned, at least in Western countries. An article more recent than the 7 years old book that you cited is available here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26317877221129290 It sounds good, but like in child protection the devil is in the details. The current UK legislation the OP was talking about, after we examined it a second time, seems to favor the direction you fear, provided that you replace "far-left" or "far-right" with the political group a conglomerate supports. It adds precious tools that enhance the possibility to influence large parts of the population by the corporation themselves. Age verification out of any oversight and potentially through gathering ID cards seems a small, maybe inessential step, but on the contrary it is very instrumental (just think of the power of adding to accurate profiling a real ID document of the profiled person, with real exact address, accurate photo, fiscal code...), also possibly a prelude to "chat control" and data retention (again exclusively up to private entities with no real judicial overview, as far as we can see). The Act does not "force" a private entity to store your ID card, but "allows" the private entity to do it. It also does not say "delete it after a few minutes", it just says "preserve it only for the time it's necessary and to prove your compliance", very ambiguous. Too tempting an opportunity for a lot of corporations! To continue with your parallelism with the offline life, it would be as if you authorize a tobacco shop or a market selling alcohol not only to ask for your ID card in order to verify that you're at least 21 (or 18), but to make an accurate, integral scan of the card and preserve it and create a database of accurate images of ID cards with no judicial oversight at all. This document preservation and database creation was privilege of very limited categories (such as public utilities providers). This UK Act changed radically everything. If judicial oversight, transparency requirements, antitrust enforcement, and democratic accountability are weak, as it already happens in Europe and UK due to budget restraints, government body inefficiency and lawmakers large scale corruption (*), surveillance capabilities can become intertwined with market power and political power, creating opportunities to shape public discourse, influence political outcomes, disadvantage competitors, pressure policymakers and filter out hostile politicians. Historical examples (including digital authoritarianism in USA and EU mentioned by @fsy) suggest that such risks are real, although the extent and mechanisms vary considerably across cases. By considering our mission, it is unavoidable that we strongly oppose age verification through ID cards as well as any form of blanket data retention. We would also like to add a question: are the lawmakers sure that a person under 18 is safer by surfing the Internet without a VPN than by surfing while connected to a reputable VPN? (*) For a proof of large scale corruption at least in the European Parliament from the Qatargate and on, see https://www.ftm.eu/articles/european-parliamentarians-involved-in-hundreds-of-scandals - 25% of MEPs have been involved in investigations about or found guilty of various crimes, from harassment to corruption. This is indeed on the agenda according to some rants of the Vice President of the Commission (no doubt that VPNs are a pain in the ass for some people), but we would like to remind that the highest judicial body of the EU, the CJEU, affirmed three times, with legally binding decisions, in three different cases that blanket data retention is in breach of fundamental rights and therefore no Member State can force any Internet operator to perform pre-emptive, blanket and indiscriminate retention of traffic metadata or data: https://airvpn.org/forums/topic/57288-general-questions/?do=findComment&comment=230078 Kind regards
-
I realise you people are really clued up and know what you are doing. However we the users who downloaded Eddie because we have no idea how to set up a VPN at command line level. We need a graphics bos that says connect, disconnect. So how you expect us to do these tasks to fix stuff?
- Last week
-
-
Absolutely untrue; I vehemently disagree with your verdict of my opinion. But I do realize that discussing this here was a bad idea from the start, so yeah, seeyabye!
-
Hi The VPN connection on my Synology stopped working after running without any problems for over two years. I managed to successfully create a new VPN profile using this guide. However when I tried to start the new vpn connection I got an 'Authorizaton required' error message. When I tried connecting again it returned with a 'Connection failed or certificate expired. Please use a valid certificate issued by the VPN server and try again.' error. Any idea what I could be doing wrong here? Well the problem disappared: after starting the connection a third time it did start to work!!
-
you must be atronomers with this knowledge are you going to start using the ngc catalogue or ic. or messier in the future ?
-
-
.thumb.png.8be84fd39f94c1640ac8c5456fbf3449.png)
Hello! It's a deliberate choice, like in airvpn.dev - security high level. If you want to "follow links" from the Tor site or airvpn.dev you must type or copy and paste the URL manually on your browser bar. A serious problem that comes to mind occurs if the link: opens a browser other than Tor Browser; launches external applications; downloads files that are then opened outside of Tor. In these cases, you could expose your real IP address or other identifying information. So when we want to offer higher protection disabling one or two clicks re-direction can be a wise choice. Kind regards -
Parcel shops are not permitted to make copies of an ID card or driving license, nor to compile a database of such documents. Yet several age-verification systems that have been proposed or are already in use rely on storing an ID card image (or 2, F+R) with such fidelity that every detail - including the photograph - must be perfectly visible and readable so this example is wrong and irrelevant. Age verification must not require displaying ID cards, because displaying on the Internet in this case means storing, it's a technical inevitability. Vowing to delete data after a few days or hours has already been shown by hackers and crackers to be inadequate protection. Breaches have caused theft of 37 million ID cards or more per year (official Identity Theft Resource Center data) since 2020. Just like child protection, age verification can be a business opportunity and a valuable tool for different purposes... more refined behavioral control, authoritarian surveillance, social and business more granular micro-targeting and more. At the end of the day the whole thing is only a matter to make more money and control people more efficiently (to make even more money) as usual. As you are in the UK read this: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429505 especially on the part "neoliberal transfer of responsibilities from the government to non-government organisations and citizens can be motivated by a lack of government capacity and budget but framed as a nudge towards citizen duty and adding public value". You can see the pervasiveness of this deception (or paradigm??) everywhere -- even a moderator of forums in airvpn that has historically been a little bit subversive or rebel (think of WikiLeaks...) is taking a submissive stance and seems willing to accept even greater restrictions than currently exist. OK, a community mod might not share the views or the attitude of the bosses, but I find this longing for submission worrying anyway lol ! I think that the surveillance capitalism as well (for surveillance c. I mean this: Shoshana Zuboff – The Age of Surveillance Capitalism - 2019), can like age verification (and extended data retention obligations on VPN services, proxies, etc..., a hot subject again) because on the short-mid run they may bring in more money. Seeyabye!
-
Mind the wording: You are required to have one. I didn't write anything about carrying it with you. But, it's true, transferring it to the example of online age verification, I don't need to have to verify my age every step of the way (= carrying ID with me). But then I have to live with the fact that certain services will simply be unaccessible for me. The EFF likes to picture this as a negative, but would you, unattended, let your 12 year old boy gamble his pocket money away? Or yours? Or be subjected to far-left and far-right influencing on social media? I'd like to think that's what politics is concerned about the most, at least in countries not exactly deemed totalitarian. Of course, it doesn't help that precedents exist for this to be the public reason while the actual reason is, as feared, wide-ranging restrictions. Needs more thought behind it. And at least in Germany businesses with a legitimate interest can ask for such ID, not just authorities. Think of it as the same thing with age verification: There is a legitimate interest behind it. Just one innocent example: You receive a parcel, but are not home. You may collect it from your next parcel shop, but only with ID. That's the business' policy. The paranoid mind would think "ah they're just going to collect my data" or something (I don't speak paranoid). But the actual reason: They prevent your parcel from being stolen by someone else. Because there are precedent cases; why else introduce it, go through all the trouble setting it up, the bureaucratics, the IT systems, the personnel training? Your ID therefore protects you from harm. (And, no, those cards you may find in your mailbox are not sufficient, anyone can use that to collect it for you; again: Precedent cases exist). Opportunity makes the thief. I firmly believe that the EFF massively overstate the implications. But proponents do the same, advertising for the safety this all supposedly adds. Both are wrong. Not totally, but both overstate their point of view. We must find a middle way; as I wrote before, the execution needs much more thought behind it. But the execution itself is not the wrong idea, considering the current state of things.
-
-
hello. can you give some screenshots for this two moments? Hello! 1. Go to "Settings" > "Advanced" > "Custom AmneziaWG directives", turn on "Enable CPS" switch, disable "Random Presets" and select a web site from the list appearing after you tap on "Preset". Make sure you tap "OK" at the end to confirm (if you just tap "Back" button, the settings will not be stored). 2. Go back to the main view, select "AIRVPN SERVER", long tap the country or the specific server you want to generate and export a configuration file for, and select "Export AmneziaWG profile" or "Open AmneziaWG profie with..." according to your needs. Kind regards
-
-
ANSWERED Lots of disconnections lately? Eddie
stallard replied to stallard's topic in Troubleshooting and Problems
Welp, it works- changed protocol from Automatic to OpenVPN SSL>TCP 443 and I'm good. -
hello. can you give some screenshots for this two moments?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hello! Obviously! Same in Italy, Germany, France and probably all EU countries. In Italy if police needs a positive identification while you're walking freely around and you don't have an ID card with you, police can and must use other methods (with the inconvenience that you may be required to waste a lot of time) and there is not even a fine for that. The vision of the previous moderator is very conservative and probably the basis of totalitarian regimes. 😅 Kind regards
-
-
-
-
"You do have a government-provided ID, a proof of your citizenship, you're required to have offline" No. Only to access certain services and to drive. In the UK you are not required to carry ID and enforcement can only request ID under certain circumstances.
-
My issue is not age verification its state tracking, control, censorship, and suppression of free speech. Private citizens are just that.
-
I have a server running Ubuntu 24 with a K3S node setup. I'm trying to set yup a pod with Ubuntu 24 and XFCE. The base image I'm basing mine off of is jrei/systemd-ubuntu:24.04. I've got it mostly working, there are just two issues. One is auto start and the other is DNS. This post is focusing on the DNS issue. Before bluetit starts DNS works just fine. After the connection is established DNS no longer works. In the logs I see this error: VPN Server has pushed IPv4 DNS server 10.65.2.1 ERROR: Cannot create a backup copy of resolv.conf I updated permission on the location I assume it's trying to back up to. sudo chmod 770 /etc/airvpn Then restarted bluetit, still getting the error and now DNS. If I manually set the dns server in /etc/resolv.conf it starts to "work" google works well, but any other web site is slow to resolve if it does at all. Most items don't resolve as all. The container config in K3S doesn't do anything special, it just uses default dns config. I did have to update CoreDNS, with "forward . 192.168.1.1" to get the pod's dns working before bluetit was started. What else would cause that error message? Anything else I should be looking into? Thanks for your help.
-
Hi... Can we have the Config genertor linked on this page?
-
Same question. There's about a year until macOS 28, Rosetta 2 won't be present in that version.
-
thanks alot for your answer
-
How to route (split tunnel) Tailscale?
imthetool replied to Nonplussed's topic in General & Suggestions
Also scratching my head on this one -
How to do this exactly? I mean to generate and export amnezia config.
-
-
ANSWERED Lots of disconnections lately? Eddie
stallard posted a topic in Troubleshooting and Problems
Trying different servers mainly in Switzerland and Netherlands, but having many instances of non-connection and disconnection. Not sure if anyone else has seen the change? Mostly from the last few days after months of stability. . 2026.06.20 22:08:29 - Eddie version: 2.24.6 / windows_x64, System: Windows, Name: Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2024, Version: 10.0.26100.0, Framework: v4.0.30319 . 2026.06.20 22:08:29 - Command line arguments (1): path="home" . 2026.06.20 22:08:30 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:08:31 - Reading options from C:\Users\33641\AppData\Local\Eddie\default.profile . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - OpenVPN - Version: 2.6.12 - OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024, LZO 2.10 (C:\Program Files\AirVPN\openvpn.exe) . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - SSH - Version: OpenSSH_for_Windows_9.5p2, LibreSSL 3.8.2 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\OpenSSH\\ssh.exe) . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - SSL - Version: 5.69 (C:\Program Files\AirVPN\stunnel.exe) I 2026.06.20 22:08:34 - Ready . 2026.06.20 22:08:35 - Collect information about AirVPN completed I 2026.06.20 22:08:36 - Session starting. . 2026.06.20 22:08:36 - Activation of Network Lock - Windows Filtering Platform I 2026.06.20 22:08:37 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:08:37 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:08:38 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:38 - WireGuard > Setup start . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setup complete . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Watching network interfaces . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Resolving DNS names . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Creating network adapter . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Using existing driver 0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Creating adapter . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Using WireGuardNT/0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Dropping privileges . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Interface created . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setup interface . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting interface configuration . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Peer 1 created . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting device v4 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Interface up . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting device v6 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Startup complete . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - WireGuard > Received first handshake . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv6 . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering enabled. . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to 10.128.0.1) . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to fd7d:76ee:e68f:a993::1) . 2026.06.20 22:08:41 - Routes, add 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:41 - Routes, add 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:42 - Routes, add ::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:42 - Routes, add 8000::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:43 - Routes, add 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Routes, add 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Flushing DNS I 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Checking route IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:09:20 - Checking route (4° try) . 2026.06.20 22:09:34 - Checking route (5° try) E 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - Checking route IPv4 failed, last reason: Fetch url error:Timeout was reached ! 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - Disconnecting . 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - WireGuard > Stop request received . 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - WireGuard > Stopping . 2026.06.20 22:09:45 - WireGuard > Completed . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete ::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 8000::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering disabled. . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - Connection terminated. I 2026.06.20 22:09:51 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - WireGuard > Setup start . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setup complete . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Watching network interfaces . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Resolving DNS names . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Creating network adapter . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Using existing driver 0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Creating adapter . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Using WireGuardNT/0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Dropping privileges . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Interface created . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setup interface . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting interface configuration . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Peer 1 created . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting device v4 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Interface up . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting device v6 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Startup complete . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Received first handshake . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv6 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering enabled. . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to 10.128.0.1) . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to fd7d:76ee:e68f:a993::1) . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - Routes, add 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:56 - Routes, add 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:56 - Routes, add ::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:57 - Routes, add 8000::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:57 - Routes, add 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Routes, add 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Flushing DNS I 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Checking route IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:10:34 - Checking route (4° try) . 2026.06.20 22:10:48 - Checking route (5° try) E 2026.06.20 22:10:58 - Checking route IPv4 failed, last reason: Fetch url error:Timeout was reached ! 2026.06.20 22:10:58 - Disconnecting . 2026.06.20 22:10:59 - WireGuard > Stop request received . 2026.06.20 22:10:59 - WireGuard > Stopping . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - WireGuard > Completed . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete ::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 8000::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering disabled. . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - Connection terminated. I 2026.06.20 22:11:05 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:11:05 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:11:06 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:11:06 - WireGuard > Setup start
.thumb.jpg.2bc2ef88c202779f779862e89027b416.jpg)
