Not connected, Your IP: 216.73.217.99
Online: 43759 users - 531275 Mbit/s total BWAll Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Today
-
hello. can you give some screenshots for this two moments?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hello! Obviously! Same in Italy, Germany, France and probably all EU countries. In Italy if police needs a positive identification while you're walking freely around and you don't have an ID card with you, police can and must use other methods (with the inconvenience that you may be required to waste a lot of time) and there is not even a fine for that. The vision of the previous moderator is very conservative and probably the basis of totalitarian regimes. 😅 Kind regards
-
-
-
-
"You do have a government-provided ID, a proof of your citizenship, you're required to have offline" No. Only to access certain services and to drive. In the UK you are not required to carry ID and enforcement can only request ID under certain circumstances.
-
My issue is not age verification its state tracking, control, censorship, and suppression of free speech. Private citizens are just that.
-
I have a server running Ubuntu 24 with a K3S node setup. I'm trying to set yup a pod with Ubuntu 24 and XFCE. The base image I'm basing mine off of is jrei/systemd-ubuntu:24.04. I've got it mostly working, there are just two issues. One is auto start and the other is DNS. This post is focusing on the DNS issue. Before bluetit starts DNS works just fine. After the connection is established DNS no longer works. In the logs I see this error: VPN Server has pushed IPv4 DNS server 10.65.2.1 ERROR: Cannot create a backup copy of resolv.conf I updated permission on the location I assume it's trying to back up to. sudo chmod 770 /etc/airvpn Then restarted bluetit, still getting the error and now DNS. If I manually set the dns server in /etc/resolv.conf it starts to "work" google works well, but any other web site is slow to resolve if it does at all. Most items don't resolve as all. The container config in K3S doesn't do anything special, it just uses default dns config. I did have to update CoreDNS, with "forward . 192.168.1.1" to get the pod's dns working before bluetit was started. What else would cause that error message? Anything else I should be looking into? Thanks for your help.
-
Hi... Can we have the Config genertor linked on this page?
-
Same question. There's about a year until macOS 28, Rosetta 2 won't be present in that version.
- Yesterday
-
thanks alot for your answer
-
How to route (split tunnel) Tailscale?
imthetool replied to Nonplussed's topic in General & Suggestions
Also scratching my head on this one -
How to do this exactly? I mean to generate and export amnezia config.
- Last week
-
-
Trying different servers mainly in Switzerland and Netherlands, but having many instances of non-connection and disconnection. Not sure if anyone else has seen the change? Mostly from the last few days after months of stability. . 2026.06.20 22:08:29 - Eddie version: 2.24.6 / windows_x64, System: Windows, Name: Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2024, Version: 10.0.26100.0, Framework: v4.0.30319 . 2026.06.20 22:08:29 - Command line arguments (1): path="home" . 2026.06.20 22:08:30 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:08:31 - Reading options from C:\Users\33641\AppData\Local\Eddie\default.profile . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - OpenVPN - Version: 2.6.12 - OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024, LZO 2.10 (C:\Program Files\AirVPN\openvpn.exe) . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - SSH - Version: OpenSSH_for_Windows_9.5p2, LibreSSL 3.8.2 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\OpenSSH\\ssh.exe) . 2026.06.20 22:08:32 - SSL - Version: 5.69 (C:\Program Files\AirVPN\stunnel.exe) I 2026.06.20 22:08:34 - Ready . 2026.06.20 22:08:35 - Collect information about AirVPN completed I 2026.06.20 22:08:36 - Session starting. . 2026.06.20 22:08:36 - Activation of Network Lock - Windows Filtering Platform I 2026.06.20 22:08:37 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:08:37 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:08:38 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:38 - WireGuard > Setup start . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setup complete . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Watching network interfaces . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Resolving DNS names . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Creating network adapter . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Using existing driver 0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Creating adapter . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Using WireGuardNT/0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Dropping privileges . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Interface created . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setup interface . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting interface configuration . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Peer 1 created . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting device v4 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Interface up . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Setting device v6 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:08:39 - WireGuard > Startup complete . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - WireGuard > Received first handshake . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv6 . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering enabled. . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to 10.128.0.1) . 2026.06.20 22:08:40 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to fd7d:76ee:e68f:a993::1) . 2026.06.20 22:08:41 - Routes, add 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:41 - Routes, add 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:42 - Routes, add ::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:42 - Routes, add 8000::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:43 - Routes, add 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Routes, add 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Flushing DNS I 2026.06.20 22:08:44 - Checking route IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:09:20 - Checking route (4° try) . 2026.06.20 22:09:34 - Checking route (5° try) E 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - Checking route IPv4 failed, last reason: Fetch url error:Timeout was reached ! 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - Disconnecting . 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - WireGuard > Stop request received . 2026.06.20 22:09:44 - WireGuard > Stopping . 2026.06.20 22:09:45 - WireGuard > Completed . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete ::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:46 - Routes, delete 8000::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - Routes, delete 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:09:47 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering disabled. . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:09:48 - Connection terminated. I 2026.06.20 22:09:51 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:52 - WireGuard > Setup start . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setup complete . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Watching network interfaces . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Resolving DNS names . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Creating network adapter . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Using existing driver 0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Creating adapter . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Using WireGuardNT/0.10 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Dropping privileges . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Interface created . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setup interface . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting interface configuration . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Peer 1 created . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting device v4 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Interface up . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Setting device v6 addresses . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Startup complete . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - WireGuard > Received first handshake . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - Interface Eddie metric changed from Automatic to 3, layer IPv6 . 2026.06.20 22:09:54 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering enabled. . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to 10.128.0.1) . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter forced (Eddie, from automatic to fd7d:76ee:e68f:a993::1) . 2026.06.20 22:09:55 - Routes, add 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:56 - Routes, add 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:56 - Routes, add ::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:57 - Routes, add 8000::/1 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:57 - Routes, add 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Routes, add 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "Eddie (WireGuard Tunnel)". . 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Flushing DNS I 2026.06.20 22:09:58 - Checking route IPv4 . 2026.06.20 22:10:34 - Checking route (4° try) . 2026.06.20 22:10:48 - Checking route (5° try) E 2026.06.20 22:10:58 - Checking route IPv4 failed, last reason: Fetch url error:Timeout was reached ! 2026.06.20 22:10:58 - Disconnecting . 2026.06.20 22:10:59 - WireGuard > Stop request received . 2026.06.20 22:10:59 - WireGuard > Stopping . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - WireGuard > Completed . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 0.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 128.0.0.0/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete ::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:00 - Routes, delete 8000::/1 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 86.106.84.167/32 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - Routes, delete 2a0d:5600:125:2:7ce:e834:711d:f58c/128 for interface "{7CB6D269-0786-7E57-C13F-6CDFFF02FB02}", not exists. . 2026.06.20 22:11:01 - DNS IPv4 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - DNS IPv6 of a network adapter restored to original settings (Eddie, to automatic) . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - DNS leak protection with packet filtering disabled. . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - Collect network information . 2026.06.20 22:11:02 - Connection terminated. I 2026.06.20 22:11:05 - Checking authorization ... ! 2026.06.20 22:11:05 - Connecting to Athebyne (Switzerland, Zurich) . 2026.06.20 22:11:06 - Routes, add 86.106.84.164/32 for interface "Wi-Fi (Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz)". . 2026.06.20 22:11:06 - WireGuard > Setup start
-
There is no kill switch, only Network Lock which is a set of firewall rules meant to prevent all traffic outside the VPN. A kill switch reacts to a failed connection which can or cannot happen; firewall rules are just sitting there, blocking everything, so this approach is superior. You dont't need to be doing anything special to enable NetLock – it's engaged by default when you connect. To check, look to the top right corner of Eddie's window: If the lock is locked, so is the network.
-
-
If you can use another application with a Airvpn Wireguard config, i recommend to have a look at WireSock ( https://www.wiresock.net/ ). It is miles better for split-tunneling. Per IP, per application, per folder, anything is possible. -kind regards
-
-
-
Hi, thank you very much for your quick reply. I have one more question: How do I activate the Kill Switch? Thank you.
-
Eddie Preferences > Routes +, enter the IP address, select Outside the VPN tunnel, Save, Save.
-
What I mean by what you quoted was only now in 2026 when VPNs are soon to be 'in scope' (in UK) and surely covered elsewhere is that VPN providers finally starting to raise the alarms. That a VPN provider backs the EFF who was active early on is good and my comments aren't really directed at AirVPN whom I don't think has been as some of the 'leopards at my face' VPN providers I have seen on social media/tech news sites as of late. Per the Discord hack, this is part of what I call the "big platform AV fallacy". Not a single AV law requires *only* face scans and/or submitting an ID. Every one allows third-party database checking. In other words, for US and UK at least, simply typing in a phone # or inputting one's street address *and nothing more* for almost all users is enough. Discord will stick to face scans/ID submissions because they are a freemium platform that wants to stay as much in the black as possible. This means they will only use the verification methods with the highest friction as any user who doesn't want to do that has a high chance of never becoming a Nitro user/not that active on Discord to begin with. Of course, they messed up badly per the leak but if they allowed third-party DB checking, there would not have been a leak to begin with (or at worst a significantly smaller one). But just like some VPN providers (again, not Air), when the writing was on the wall leading up to AV bills working through the government, they were quiet. Censorship may begin with the lowest hanging fruit (adult), but it will rise and affect other venues of free speech in good time. Per the EU AV methods via an app/device, looks promising! TBD per actual implementation. I'm hopeful though.
-
-
-
Hi, I came across AirVPN and I wanted to ask whether it is possible in their Windows app (Eddie) (Split tunneling ) to exclude an IPv4 address so that this IP is not routed through the VPN. I would really appreciate a response and I hope I’m in the right thread.
-
@Tech Jedi Alex Hello! Just to point out that age verification should have nothing to do with identity check. Various countries, the European Commission and some Italian bodies are studying methods of age verification that don't force the citizen to show his/her ID card at any step, and surely not to private entities they don't even know. If the UK wants to implement age verification through identity verification we don't know, but it would be a giant mistake that would allow potentially shady entities to steal and build highly reliable ID databases with huge monetary value on the black market. The Discord Hack catastrophe is a useful reminder https://www.404media.co/the-discord-hack-is-every-users-worst-nightmare/ Then of course you can debate ad nauseam about whether it is right or wrong that a person younger than 21, 18 or 16 should be forbidden to connect to a virtual private network, Tor, proxy, etc. For the readers, our position is close to EFF position, see here: https://www.eff.org/issues/age-verification We were with EDRi and EFF as usual, how can you not know?! Check our mission and endorsement page. The same must be said of some other VPNs to be honest. Kind regards
-
As someone who has had to help adult sites integrate AV and has had their eye on the legislation in UK and USA for some years now, it's too little too late. It may offend some, but where were the VPN providers several years ago when the adult industry was raising a five alarm fire about these regulations? Voicing some support in the form of amicus briefs (see FSC vs Paxton) that some outside industry elements did is nice, but far from enough. On the UK front, this holds just as true. Ofcom per enforcement has been a mixed bag (putting it lightly), but they are *well aware* of the VPN loophole and there's an important thing to note per VPNs: Unlike adult sites where many of the largest happen to be illicitly monetized pirate sites that will never bend the knee (good luck getting some ad-supported site hosted in Moldova to comply with anything), VPNs are immediately monetized and thus no matter how much vocal support they may emit, at the end of the day, their billing partners *will* make them comply with laws (as is the case for any adult site now with credit card processing--billers are checking and no AV = suspension/termination). AirVPN could say they won't comply, but if PayPal/their card billing providers say "comply or we shut you off", they will comply, as will every other VPN provider out there. Crypto and other alternative methods could still work, but most still don't use them and even a privacy-focused business would see a huge loss of sales by removing plastic as a checkout option. Just for clarity: every complaint about the effectiveness of these laws voiced by those against them I totally agree with. But the ship containing common sense has sailed off and may not be back for awhile. Now we need to deal with the cards we're dealt.
-
Hello, i try to connect via Kodachi Linux Security Dashboard (Debian Linux). I have generated config files for OpenVPN and WireGuard and none works. On WG i get the error: Error: Failed to connect to wireguard: WireGuard interface wg0 exists but has no IP address On OpenVPN the internet gets disconnected. Tor is disconnected, DNSCrypt is disconnected as well. On the Eddie app i can connect but it loses connection as soon as i connect to TOR. Any idea how to connect? Or any idea how to configure TOR on Eddie app? Thanks
-
Actually, I find this to be a reasonable thing, but pretty much all political endeavors came quite a few decades too late for that party. Now, every implementation of such user verification will have so many holes in it, you'd wonder whether it's got enough substance to even be called swiss cheese. Probably more like some bits of cheese dangling in the air. At least as long as single countries still try to do crap themselves while the internet as a whole simply continues defying political borders. The principle is very easy: You do have a government-provided ID, a proof of your citizenship, you're required to have offline, so the idea that the online world is somehow excluded from that requirement defies simple logic. It's not a different world, it's an extension of the offline world. The fact that we didn't have such ID all this time simply shows that technology got politics beat in speed by orders of magnitude. And still can't catch up, as UK and other jurisdictions are so kindly demonstating. When something started as a research network, an implementation of some sort of ID is the farthest thing from being the next feature to be implemented – doesn't help the tech, after all – and by the time that research network reached a certain size it was already too late to implement anything like that. Those who grew up with the internet will consequently see the absence of ID as the norm there. Authorities don't have a choice but to cling to the technical data implemented by those engineers for technical reasons and declare it PII, personally identifiable information, so that their offline authority can be somewhat applied in the extention that is the online world.. but this is so imperfect that by simply changing said PII, especially the IP address, you can evade responsibility for your actions. It's why people use VPNs and proxies – never met a person in my life who enjoyed being fined. Something that is quite difficult to do offline, though. You've been responsible for your actions ever since you can remember, so why is it supposed to be different online? Remember, it's not another world, it's an extension of the world you actually live in. Offline rules should apply. So any and all attempts to apply offline policy to the wild west that is the internet today will elicit, of course, reactions like yours. Which are understandable, you grew up with that standard. You've never known anything else. If we really think about it, the internet is the centerpiece of early 21st century society – everything revolves around it. It drastically impacts the offline world. And to prevent that online wild west to swap over to the offline world, the offline world must take measures to reign in its extension. It is only natural. Of course, this requires a proper execution… So, nothing dystopian with online age verification when we've been having this for maybe hundreds of years offline. It's high time, really. Unless you think offline age verification (as in, owning a citizen ID) is also dystopian… It's exactly why UK's endeavor will not show the desired results. A UK law won't force an Italian website to verify the visitor's age, even if said website is a VPN provider. It's outside their jurisdiction. As long as single jurisdictions do things in a single fashion, the internet will remain as it was. And AirVPN will remain as it was. There'd be a higher impact if UK would suggest such a law to the European Commi..ssion.. oh. Guess, that ship has sailed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Aludra marked as TOR node
Tech Jedi Alex replied to bellefontaine's topic in Blocked websites warning
Whoever runs a Tor exit over Aludra (CA) I hope your sleeves slide down when you'll be washing your hands one of these days.. -
In case anyone is interested I found a couple obfuscation generators for I1-I5 Using wireshark I can see the quic protocol being used. So I know this works. https://sketchystan1.github.io/payloadGen/ From bivlked https://sageptr.github.io/mini_quic_generator/ https://valokda-amnezia.vercel.app/
-
With what is going on in the UK would Airvpn ever bend the knee and submit to demands for user verification? Worth the ask. How does Italian law prevent this?
-
Are we affected by this?
.thumb.png.8be84fd39f94c1640ac8c5456fbf3449.png){kind=avatar}
