Not connected, Your IP: 216.73.216.120
Online: 34736 users - 415300 Mbit/s total BWAll Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
-
-
-
- Today
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm also confused. Perhaps the hardware isn't powerful enough? A 1Gbps server can handle 100+ users with 80% bandwidth utilization. This means a 10Gbps server would need 1000+ users to achieve the same 80% bandwidth utilization. However, in reality, a 10Gbps server experiences a significant speed drop when handling 300+ users, seemingly unable to keep up. It would be better to label it as a 3Gbps or 5Gbps server, as the actual speed difference from the advertised 10Gbps is substantial. If that's the case, it would be better to replace one 10Gbps server with ten 1Gbps servers. Maybe that's the case? I think AirVPN may have leased a 10Gbps network in the data center, but the servers can't handle that 10Gbps network. Isn't that a waste of resources? I think AirVPN can increase the number of 1Gbps servers as much as possible to make full use of network bandwidth, which would also save on server costs for AirVPN, wouldn't it?
-
-
Really? So how can this be resolved? Change the connection protocol? But it's still the same when I use AmneziaWG 1.0. Can QUIC simulation in AmneziaWG 1.5 solve this problem? My ISP did not block the corresponding UDP ports. Some servers have all ports unavailable via Wireguard, some can only use one specific port, and some can connect to all three ports. What a perplexing question! Wireguard is not as available on all servers as OpenVPN, which causes some trouble for users who use Wireguard to connect. Did WireGuard require strict network conditions from the outset? I always feel that WireGuard's compatibility is not as good as OpenVPN's. Is it that network compatibility is sacrificed for high performance? In any case, allocating more resources to Wireguard is reasonable, as Wireguard's high performance will be appreciated by more people. Of course, OpenVPN is also indispensable, as there will always be some people who need to bypass strict network restrictions. Is DCO an effective solution for optimizing both? I'm really looking forward to it. So, what stage is DCO testing at? Is DCO 2.6.14 still unstable? OpenVPN 2.7 series has already removed support for WinTun, so I believe the OpenVPN team is full of confidence in DCO for the 2.7 series. I'm really looking forward to seeing the DCO effect in the official 2.7 series.
- Yesterday
-
-
Are you sure you don't have an option somewhere in the gateway settings to prevent opnsense making static routes for monitor IP? I have that in pfsense. I usually trace the route through the VPN interface to anything (e.g. 9.9.9.9) and then use the first or second hop as the monitor address for that gateway. In past experience I've had times where gateway monitoring said everything was fine but reaching the internet wasn't happening. That's why I've taken to pinging something on the other side of the VPN gateway.
-
I've seen this happen on Vindemiatrix, and I think it happened on Taiyangshou today as well (maximum is 4.8 Gb/s but that is average so likely it did surpass 5 Gb/s). I still wonder why overall bandwidth utilization of 10 Gbps servers are low (<50%), is this just due to scaling?
-
Hello! This is a problem caused by blocks though, not a server problem. Kind regards
-
-
Hello! With WireGuard it's a very good choice as the DNS server IP address (10.128.0.1) is also the VPN gateway address, on every and each server since the WireGuard network is one. With OpenVPN, you have different subnet on every server though and you can't rely on a fixed address. 10.4.0.1 is available on every server for DNS queries but does not respond to ping. You could consider to extract the gateway from the tun interface settings at each connection and ping that gateway. Kind regards
-
Hello! Nothing wrong, it's possible that the third party service is malfunctioning. Are you able to reach your listening service from the Internet? Kind regards
-
.thumb.png.8be84fd39f94c1640ac8c5456fbf3449.png)
Expose Jellyfin to internet through AirVPN port forwarding
Staff replied to charoki60's topic in Troubleshooting and Problems
Hello! This is potentially the problem, We can't be sure because for some unfathomable reason you deleted once again the endpoint address and the port. Or did you literally enter "#ip" and "#port"? By the way, when VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER environment variable is set to an integrated VPN such as AirVPN (as it is in your case) you can rely on more proper variables that will prevent you from entering wrong addresses and/or ports. Please set the proper environment variables, delete the quoted ones (quoted here above), and check whether the problem gets resolved. Please see here again: https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun-wiki/blob/main/setup/providers/airvpn.md Kind regards -
-
-
-
-
-
I'll look into it, thank you -
For the sake of so-called security, Windows' system permission design can sometimes be quite annoying. When I installed Windows, I configured Huorong Security Software with the highest privileges, locking the core Windows processes from being tampered with. For any operations requiring high privileges, I use Huorong Security Software's toolbox, which can solve the problem with a single click, saving me a lot of trouble. -
Emule, I'm glad to see that this side of internet isn't dead! Little question if i may : i used unlocker to get rid of the files. Windows was saying that i needed the authorisation of ThrustDLL or something like that. How would you have granted yourself a higher authority...on your own pc? (The classic windows "I bought you, I assembled you...I OWN YOUUUU")
-
-
Hi Archaon1, I'm glad I could help you. Six months ago, I was just a newbie, but thanks to the community's help, I grew rapidly. Now, I can finally help others too. That's the meaning of a community. Haha, it's really satisfying to help others. 🎉🎉🎉
-
I configured a few instances on my OpnSense router that connect to AirVPN. Afterwards I configured them as gateways. As part of the process one is advised to specify a monitor IP that the system pings to determine if the corresponding gateway is up and what the latency is. For the first one I use the IPs of AirVPN DNS server. Are there any other IP addresses that could be used as monitor IPs? Currently I picked some random IP addresses from the corresponding countries. I suppose that's not the best solution, it's not nice for IP owners to be constantly pinged and then there is no guarantee that the IPs stay up or not gonna block me. I'd like to avoid using something like 8.8.8.8 or 1.1.1.1, etc as I need these DNS servers to be routable from other subnets without locking them to just one. But if there are some other IPs on the Internet are there to be used as monitor IPs please share what they are.
-
Hi Emule, Hard to follow someone with 35 posts but it worked out! I was a bit suspicious when you asked about deleting system32's files but my VPN is working fine now ^^ Thanks a lot, I wouldn't have found it on my own. For the data : i did the suppression of all the files and the reboot of the network
-
Did everyone notice? The Kornephoros server achieved astonishing speeds today. As a 10Gbps server, it loaded over 5Gbps of bandwidth. I've never seen such speeds on any 10Gbps server before. What makes this server different from other 10Gbps servers? Is it the unprecedentedly powerful hardware, the data center's network environment, or AirVPN's optimization of the server's kernel? Staff can take a look and use this information to optimize other 10Gbps servers. Kornephoros is truly unexpected.
-
-
+1
-
+1 I also love AirVPN.
-
Yes, I'm using AmneziaWG to connect, and on many servers, all WireGuard ports are either unavailable or only one port is available. However, OpenVPN can connect using all protocols. I suspect OpenVPN is consuming too many resources, leaving the servers with no resources available for WireGuard connections. Allocating more server resources to WireGuard might be the solution to the WireGuard connectivity problem.
-
If possible, after deleting the files, perform a network reset (Windows Settings - Network & Internet - Advanced network settings - Network reset). This operation will remove all hidden WireGuard network adapters. After restarting your computer, run Eddie to cleanly install the WireGuard driver and its network adapter.
-
You need to delete the Wireguard folder and files in your image. Let Eddie recreate it for you.
-
These files are all related to the Wireguard driver. A normal file should look like this, see my image (please replace wintun with wireguard, because I am using AmneziaWG). The order of your files is different; they have likely been changed (possibly by other software or a Windows driver update). Try deleting and recreating them.
- Last week
-
-
-
Hi! Thank you for joining! In the FileRepository, i've got one folder wireguard and many wireguard files. Should i only delete the folder? All good for the wireguard.sys and i found nothing through the Device Manager.
-
Staff, Only windows defender is active. I turned off the firewall and the protection vs the virus but nothing changed. Same error. Here is the journal is that helps : 2025-12-09 14:29:03.231049: [MGR] Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) 2025-12-09 14:29:03.244177: [MGR] Starting UI process for user ‘admin@DESKTOP-7EDM8FG’ for session 26 2025-12-09 14:33:50.165239: [TUN] [wg] Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) 2025-12-09 14:33:50.165239: [TUN] [wg] Watching network interfaces 2025-12-09 14:33:50.170649: [TUN] [wg] Resolving DNS names 2025-12-09 14:33:50.271950: [TUN] [wg] Creating network adapter 2025-12-09 14:33:50.560462: [TUN] [wg] Using existing driver 0.10 2025-12-09 14:33:50.591911: [TUN] [wg] Creating adapter 2025-12-09 14:33:50.930792: [TUN] [wg] Using WireGuardNT/0.10 2025-12-09 14:33:50.930792: [TUN] [wg] Enabling firewall rules 2025-12-09 14:33:50.902400: [TUN] [wg] Interface created 2025-12-09 14:33:50.942891: [TUN] [wg] Dropping privileges 2025-12-09 14:33:50.943440: [TUN] [wg] Setting interface configuration 2025-12-09 14:33:50.944575: [TUN] [wg] Peer 1 created 2025-12-09 14:33:50.946176: [TUN] [wg] Sending keepalive packet to peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:33:50.946176: [TUN] [wg] Sending handshake initiation to peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:33:50.946176: [TUN] [wg] Interface up 2025-12-09 14:33:50.956310: [TUN] [wg] Receiving handshake response from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:33:50.956310: [TUN] [wg] Keypair 1 created for peer 1 2025-12-09 14:34:01.453036: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:34:11.692617: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:34:22.447712: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:34:33.456590: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:34:44.456663: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:34:50.952377: [TUN] [wg] Unable to create network adapter: TCP/IP interface for adapter did not appear after one minute 2025-12-09 14:34:51.111467: [TUN] [wg] Shutting down 2025-12-09 14:34:51.114346: [MGR] [wg] Tunnel service tracker finished 2025-12-09 14:35:46.968946: [TUN] [wg] Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) 2025-12-09 14:35:46.968946: [TUN] [wg] Watching network interfaces 2025-12-09 14:35:46.975098: [TUN] [wg] Resolving DNS names 2025-12-09 14:35:46.994182: [TUN] [wg] Creating network adapter 2025-12-09 14:35:47.213012: [TUN] [wg] Using existing driver 0.10 2025-12-09 14:35:47.233532: [TUN] [wg] Creating adapter 2025-12-09 14:35:47.555078: [TUN] [wg] Using WireGuardNT/0.10 2025-12-09 14:35:47.555610: [TUN] [wg] Enabling firewall rules 2025-12-09 14:35:47.528691: [TUN] [wg] Interface created 2025-12-09 14:35:47.564776: [TUN] [wg] Dropping privileges 2025-12-09 14:35:47.571208: [TUN] [wg] Setting interface configuration 2025-12-09 14:35:47.571730: [TUN] [wg] Peer 1 created 2025-12-09 14:35:47.572830: [TUN] [wg] Sending keepalive packet to peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:35:47.572830: [TUN] [wg] Interface up 2025-12-09 14:35:47.572830: [TUN] [wg] Sending handshake initiation to peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:35:47.590126: [TUN] [wg] Receiving handshake response from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:35:47.590126: [TUN] [wg] Keypair 1 created for peer 1 2025-12-09 14:35:57.931168: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:36:08.171736: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:36:18.921786: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:36:29.931008: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:36:40.943255: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.186.37:1637) 2025-12-09 14:36:47.583625: [TUN] [wg] Unable to create network adapter: TCP/IP interface for adapter did not appear after one minute 2025-12-09 14:36:47.739477: [TUN] [wg] Shutting down 2025-12-09 14:36:47.742422: [MGR] [wg] Tunnel service tracker finished 2025-12-09 15:22:04.939420: [TUN] [wg] Starting WireGuard/0.5.3 (Windows 10.0.26100; amd64) 2025-12-09 15:22:04.939420: [TUN] [wg] Watching network interfaces 2025-12-09 15:22:04.942684: [TUN] [wg] Resolving DNS names 2025-12-09 15:22:05.044963: [TUN] [wg] Creating network adapter 2025-12-09 15:22:05.248893: [TUN] [wg] Using existing driver 0.10 2025-12-09 15:22:05.271745: [TUN] [wg] Creating adapter 2025-12-09 15:22:05.567554: [TUN] [wg] Using WireGuardNT/0.10 2025-12-09 15:22:05.569281: [TUN] [wg] Enabling firewall rules 2025-12-09 15:22:05.544065: [TUN] [wg] Interface created 2025-12-09 15:22:05.577540: [TUN] [wg] Dropping privileges 2025-12-09 15:22:05.578770: [TUN] [wg] Setting interface configuration 2025-12-09 15:22:05.579324: [TUN] [wg] Peer 1 created 2025-12-09 15:22:05.580444: [TUN] [wg] Sending keepalive packet to peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:05.580444: [TUN] [wg] Sending handshake initiation to peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:05.580444: [TUN] [wg] Interface up 2025-12-09 15:22:05.598247: [TUN] [wg] Receiving handshake response from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:05.598247: [TUN] [wg] Keypair 1 created for peer 1 2025-12-09 15:22:15.809056: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:26.305812: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:36.798333: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:47.804209: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:22:58.810823: [TUN] [wg] Receiving keepalive packet from peer 1 (213.152.161.231:1637) 2025-12-09 15:23:05.588762: [TUN] [wg] Unable to create network adapter: TCP/IP interface for adapter did not appear after one minute 2025-12-09 15:23:05.690754: [TUN] [wg] Shutting down 2025-12-09 15:23:05.692326: [MGR] [wg] Tunnel service tracker finished 2025-12-09 15:23:09.620094: [MGR] [wg] Tunnel service tracker finished
-
This is a driver issue; I've encountered this problem before. Windows may have remnants of an older version of the Wireguard service (the driver has been modified by other software). You can try deleting the wireguard.sys driver (check in Device Manager for a network adapter named "Wireguard Tunnel," right-click to uninstall the device, and check the box to delete its driver), then restart your computer and run Wireguard again to see if you can connect. If the network adapter cannot be found in Device Manager, delete wireguard.sys in the directory C:\Windows\System32\drivers, and delete the folders containing "wireguard" in the directory C:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository. Then restart your computer and run the Eddie or Wireguard client again to connect. (Deleting the drivers in this directory requires system privileges or can be done in a PE system. Do not delete other files, otherwise it will cause system errors.) Hope this helps.
-
Hello! Something is blocking the creation of the virtual network interface that WireGuard needs, so it was not an Eddie's problem. Do you run any antimalware tool that might be blocking networking operations and/or blocking software that needs to modify network configuration with administrator privileges? Kind regards
