Leaderboard

While I love that you continue to support OpenVPN would you please reconsider a few WireGuard‑only 10–20 Gbit servers to quantify the uplift for users who prioritize raw speed and low latency? It’s my understanding that OpenVPN server processes are single‑threaded and CPU‑intensive. Co‑hosting OpenVPN and WireGuard on the same high‑capacity host (10–20 Gbit) can constrain aggregate throughput under load because per‑core bottlenecks caps per‑host headroom when many OpenVPN clients are active. In cities where you have multiple 20 Gbit servers like New York dedicating one to Wireguard doesn't seem unreasonable? Thank you for your consideration.

Hello! After a year of using AirVPN I'm very happy with the product. Website has no bloat whatsoever and it's super easy to find what you are looking for. A huge plus goes out for having an active forum available! Much better option compared to social media idiocies. Also port forwarding has been executed greatly - many other VPN services miss that altogether but even those which support it can't match AirVPN's easy-to-use robust system. Config generator is a great plus too since I'm using both WireGuard app and WireSock depending on the situation and needs. Both run just fine and very few VPN's could match this level of usability. I sometimes have dissapointing speeds with P2P, but usually a simple server change fixes it. Overall very happy customer. Please have a beer AirVPN staff, you've deserved it!