Leaderboard

For now, we ask you to ignore that message. It is caused by the fact that the current macOS UI is written in Xamarin, which does not support arm64 compilation. One of our goals is to release a new modern UI, natively compiled for arm64, before this restriction becomes a problem.

Hello! We're very glad to inform you that two new 10 Gbit/s full duplex servers located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, are available: Dedalus and Felix. The AirVPN client will show automatically the new servers; if you use any other OpenVPN or WireGuard client you can generate all the files to access them through our configuration/certificates/key generator (menu "Client Area"->"Config generator"). The servers accept connections on ports 53, 80, 443, 1194, 2018 UDP and TCP for OpenVPN and ports 1637, 47107 and 51820 UDP for WireGuard. They support OpenVPN over SSL and OpenVPN over SSH, TLS 1.3, OpenVPN tls-crypt and WireGuard. Full IPv6 support is included as well. As usual no traffic limits, no logs, no discrimination on protocols and hardened security against various attacks with separate entry and exit-IP addresses. You can check the status as usual in our real time servers monitor : https://airvpn.org/servers/Dedalus https://airvpn.org/servers/Felix Do not hesitate to contact us for any information or issue. Kind regards & datalove AirVPN Staff

Probably not. If the IP address itself is entered into the database as a VPN exit and even enriched with more data on supported protocols and the provider's policies (No-Log, ad filter, post forwarding), this is undefeatable. You are so out of luck here. I mean, wow, look at that information density. ❯ curl https://proxycheck.io/v3/184.75.221.171 { "status": "ok", "184.75.221.171": { "network": { "asn": "AS32489", "range": "184.75.221.171/29", "hostname": null, "provider": "Amanah Tech Inc.", "organisation": "Airvpn.org", "type": "Hosting" }, "location": { "continent_name": "North America", "continent_code": "NA", "country_name": "Canada", "country_code": "CA", "region_name": "Ontario", "region_code": "ON", "city_name": "Toronto", "postal_code": "M5A", "latitude": 43.6532, "longitude": -79.3832, "timezone": "America/Toronto", "currency": { "name": "Dollar", "code": "CAD", "symbol": "CA$" } }, "device_estimate": { "address": 10, "subnet": 110 }, "detections": { "proxy": false, "vpn": true, "compromised": true, "scraper": false, "tor": false, "hosting": true, "anonymous": true, "risk": 100, "confidence": 100, "first_seen": "2026-06-27T00:58:54Z", "last_seen": "2026-07-26T17:41:52Z" }, "detection_history": { "delisted": false, "delist_datetime": "2026-08-09T17:41:52Z" }, "attack_history": null, "operator": { "name": "AirVPN", "url": "https://airvpn.org/", "anonymity": "high", "popularity": "high", "services": [ "datacenter_vpns" ], "protocols": [ "OpenVPN", "WireGuard" ], "policies": { "ad_filtering": false, "free_access": false, "paid_access": true, "port_forwarding": true, "logging": false, "anonymous_payments": true, "crypto_payments": true, "traceable_ownership": true }, "additional_operators": null }, "last_updated": "2026-07-26T17:41:52Z" }, "query_time": 2 } Quite on point, that service. My private VPN server is also detected as VPN (but not the protocols), but prints a much lower risk, which somewhat explains why I can access most things via that VPN server still, as opposed to via AirVPN where CAPTCHAs or outright blocks were a constant companion.