999null

Probably not. If the IP address itself is entered into the database as a VPN exit and even enriched with more data on supported protocols and the provider's policies (No-Log, ad filter, post forwarding), this is undefeatable. You are so out of luck here.
I mean, wow, look at that information density.
❯ curl https://proxycheck.io/v3/184.75.221.171
{
   "status": "ok",
   "184.75.221.171": {
       "network": {
           "asn": "AS32489",
           "range": "184.75.221.171/29",
           "hostname": null,
           "provider": "Amanah Tech Inc.",
           "organisation": "Airvpn.org",
           "type": "Hosting"
       },
       "location": {
           "continent_name": "North America",
           "continent_code": "NA",
           "country_name": "Canada",
           "country_code": "CA",
           "region_name": "Ontario",
           "region_code": "ON",
           "city_name": "Toronto",
           "postal_code": "M5A",
           "latitude": 43.6532,
           "longitude": -79.3832,
           "timezone": "America/Toronto",
           "currency": {
               "name": "Dollar",
               "code": "CAD",
               "symbol": "CA$"
           }
       },
       "device_estimate": {
           "address": 10,
           "subnet": 110
       },
       "detections": {
           "proxy": false,
           "vpn": true,
           "compromised": true,
           "scraper": false,
           "tor": false,
           "hosting": true,
           "anonymous": true,
           "risk": 100,
           "confidence": 100,
           "first_seen": "2026-06-27T00:58:54Z",
           "last_seen": "2026-07-26T17:41:52Z"
       },
       "detection_history": {
           "delisted": false,
           "delist_datetime": "2026-08-09T17:41:52Z"
       },
       "attack_history": null,
       "operator": {
           "name": "AirVPN",
           "url": "https://airvpn.org/",
           "anonymity": "high",
           "popularity": "high",
           "services": [
               "datacenter_vpns"
           ],
           "protocols": [
               "OpenVPN",
               "WireGuard"
           ],
           "policies": {
               "ad_filtering": false,
               "free_access": false,
               "paid_access": true,
               "port_forwarding": true,
               "logging": false,
               "anonymous_payments": true,
               "crypto_payments": true,
               "traceable_ownership": true
           },
           "additional_operators": null
       },
       "last_updated": "2026-07-26T17:41:52Z"
   },
   "query_time": 2
}
 
Quite on point, that service. My private VPN server is also detected as VPN (but not the protocols), but prints a much lower risk, which somewhat explains why I can access most things via that VPN server still, as opposed to via AirVPN where CAPTCHAs or outright blocks were a constant companion.

Using Wireguard, the logs should be in the journal.
# journalctl -k --grep wireguard
.

Hello!
 
Steve Marquess, President of the OpenSSL Software Foundation, wishes to thank AirVPN community and AirVPN for the donation:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg74275.html
 
Kind regards

After searching the forums I was unable to find any guide on using stunnel. From what I understand you download the new config files using the config generator, download stunnel from this page, run the command (above post) from a Windows command prompt, and then launch OpenVPN like normal using the new SSL config file you downloaded. When you disconnect from OpenVPN, just close the SSL Window.
 
I've written this up just in case anybody else has the same problem/questions. Thanks!