Search the Community

I would like to start this thread to try to understand the practical implications of Rule 41 for vpn users and service providers. - As I understand it, Rule 41 requires two things: 1) anything that could be considered criminal activity (something as simple as sharing a copyrighted photo, or anything that exceeds the vague boundaries of Fair Use), and 2) using any vpn technology (TOR, Openvpn, Airvpn, etc.) while doing so. - if the FBI or other three letter organizations (TLOs) believes such activity is happening they can obtain a simple blanket court order to install spyware on a suspect's computer or phone to record the activity and reveal the user's identity (and who knows what else). This applies not just to US citizens but to anyone worldwide (stunningly draconian overreach). It's not clear to me how broad this blanket can be, or whether the TLO needs probable cause. This brings up so many questions it's hard to know where to begin: - What technical options do TLOs have for installing spyware? How easy is it for them to do this? - How can vpn users protect themselves from having spyware installed on their computers? - How will this affect Airvpn's service? - Will it be more risky to use US located servers? I hope people who respond to this thread will differentiate between speculation (which can be useful) and established fact so that we can arrive at a clear understanding of how Rule 41 will affect vpn users and service providers. Also I think it would be very helpful if Airvpn staff either contribute here, or put out a statement that answers questions around Rule 41 and provides specific help. P.S. Links to succinct factual sources would be especially helpful.