Leaderboard

Thanks for the answer. Maybe this can be incorporated into the FAQ. So basically you have a separate job/Script/service that removes the peer and with it records of a connection? This sounds great for wireguard. And also with that removal of peer, you drop all the info about the client like data volume etc? Basically, after 3min, even you (as in airvpn) shouldn't know if a wireguard connection was ever used for a specific account. Is there a different logging policy applied for wireguard compared to OpenVPN? Thanks

While using AirVPN with qBittorrent I see slow speeds with torrents, once I disable AirVPN my speeds go back to normal. To clarify I'm hitting at most 100-300 Kib/s while using AirVPN, 100+Mib/s without AirVPN on the same torrent. So far I have set my Protocol to Wireguard "official wireguard port", I've tried several servers but experience the same speeds between them all. In qBittorrent I have bound the network interface to "Eddie", I also entered the forwarded port AirVPN provided me with in qBittorrent>Connection>Port used for incoming connections. I'm not sure if that is the right spot to put the forwarded port. I'm looking for a guide or if anybody knows specific settings I'm needing to change to get AirVPN working properly with qBittorrent. I've searched google and these forums but I see a lot of dated and contradicting information on what settings I should change.

Exactly. A business migration to an "offshore, sovereign nation" might seem like the best solution here, but it's just a hammer putting an angle to the nail. Sure, (Corporation, et al) Taxes might be lower elsewhere, but the proposed unregulated, dynamic blacklist system being implemented in Italy, applies globally to AirVPN's and all Italian resident-customers. If AirVPN were to still be a registered Italian business, and somehow implement technological bypasses of the blacklist to reallow Italian resident-customers, then even a layman could see an argument for detrimental culpability subject to their own business registation laws, if they wish to continue operating out of Italian jurisdiction. I'm certain that the Owners, Staff, Lawyers of AirVPN, being at least of Italian business registration since inception, are taking this legislative battle to heart. Many others will too: I'd bet there'll be an EU review into the frameworks implementation sooner rather than later, once it's filtering impact and resonance are actualised. @Staff Will do whatever they feel is most legal, and best feasible. But there's one reason why we're customers: A "VPN operated by activists in defense of net neutrality, privacy and against censorship." That time is now.

I feel for the Italians, but how can you challenge a corrupt government "this is all part of the plan" not country specific but world-wide ! One small step for Italy, one giant leap for World domination

Starting some time yesterday I began to see more issues on IPLeak the fallback test fails and the dns test while detecting the right thing and saying it only detected one server like it should duplicates that one result once or sometimes twice. Here's a screenshot of what I mean. As you can see the dns test only detects one server and it's the one I connected but it shows the same identical result twice or three times Instead of just the once like it's meant too. Is this happening to everyone or just me? I'm using the latest version of firefox on windows 10 21H2, is this happening in other browsers and on other OS's? Is the site under work to fix something again and that's why the issues are happening? Thanks for the help.