go558a83nk

keep that in mind. even though a lot of posts in the forum are complaints over things not working there are a lot of users who are probably having no problems.

Online Members: 14007 - BW: 44861 Mbit/s 14000!!

I ran an AC68 for years with merlin asus firmware with zero problems connected to VPN 24/7. The only drawback was the speed limitation on openvpn imposed by the relatively weak CPU.

https://airvpn.org/topic/9270-how-to-forward-ports-in-dd-wrt-tomato-with-iptables/?hl=%2Bport+%2Bforward+%2Bdd-wrt

Not for me. Go into the addon's settings and check if the addon's main feature and the option beneath it, the one "recommended for privacy", are enabled. If yes, the problem is related to something else. yes, it's that setting that breaks the vertical scroll bar for me. also breaks some pfense web configurator things - the logon page fields for username and password are gone and the ability to expand text fields to see more by clicking and dragging is broken. if nobody else has this problem then I suppose it's a combination with something else that's relatively unique to me.

began using this when I saw it posted here. is it just me or does enabling blocking of chrome:// URIs break things? for me it removes the vertical scroll bar.

if you followed the guide exactly it should not even be possible for your LAN devices to reach the WAN gateway. Well, I thought so too and I think that I followed the guide to the point. Any suggestion on where I could have missed somethting? My first thought was that the PRIVATE NETWORKS could apply and might route my 192 /24 network through to the 10 /24 network. After removing the RFC1918 rules there was no change. A few days ago I had to add the SMTP port to the WAN PORTS, so I could send mail. The connection attempts to the SMTP got caught, but why do the http attempts not get caught or routed properly? sorry, I won't be much help. my setup never followed the guide exactly and has strayed even further from it in time.

if you followed the guide exactly it should not even be possible for your LAN devices to reach the WAN gateway.

AirVPN has a history of running this forum like it's their own. It is, after all. I've been very angry about the same thing before but I do believe it's within their right to do so. I just wish they were more transparent about it. What thread was it?

do you mean openvpn client for iOS? as far as I know the only openvpn app for iOS is openvpn connect. any other VPN app uses L2TP.

according to some tests that try to point to a theoretical max for CPUs running openvpn the N3150 should be able to do about 125mbit/s. if I understand correctly some people are consistently hitting that limit which makes my wonder why yours isn't a little faster. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743 https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115673.0 I have an AMD A6 7400K http://cpuboss.com/cpu/AMD-A6-7400K and my theoretical limit (according to the links above) is 329mbit/s but my line speed is only ~115mbit/s. Your CPU is http://cpuboss.com/cpu/Intel-Celeron-N3150

Yes. But i also tried it with 'NONE' choosed. The other option would be the AMD encryption, which of course would not make any sense for my celeron at all. With the Intel CPU i would have also the choice to use 'Intel RDRAND', but i have read, that this Intel method is untrustworthy. http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/12/we-cannot-trust-intel-and-vias-chip-based-crypto-freebsd-developers-say/ So i normaly would use BSD Cryptodev. But it does not matter, neither with RDRAND, with BSD Cryptodev or disabled, i get the same speedresults, meaning my speed is on average about 85mbit/s. Without VPN the system is fine and reaches 260mbit/s (10mbit/s more than my provider should provide :-) ) So i am quiet disappointed with this quadcore celeron that cant even manage half of my connection. Beside that, it is strange, that it shows me the CPU never uses more than 35% of its capacity. I followed this guide to set up, so i dont understand why the CPU is not working hard over 35% but stil i dont get more speed. My old pfSense router i also did with this guide and it works fine. what version of pfsense are you using? perhaps your speed is being limited by something else, not the pfsense machine?

so when is this update supposed to come out?

Oh, that is sad. But thanks for the information. I just buyed a Intel Celeron N3150 MiniPC and thought with its quadcore i would have enough power for my 250mbit internetconnection. But it looks like an avarage of 85mbit/s is possible with this CPU =(. It says it supports AES-NI but nothing changes if i disable the hardware encryption in OpenVPN. Thats why i asked if it is possible to choose 128bit. Thanks for the reply and the fast clearing of my answer before. so on the system_advanced_misc.php page of your pfsense machine you are setting cryptographic hardware to AES-NI? What are your choices there? and in the openvpn client setup page for hardware crypto you are choosing what? Mine says BSD cryptodev engine, but I have an AMD chip. I don't know if it's different for an Intel CPU.

what's so hard about installing openvpn connect from the apple app store?

might as well get used to it.

A VPN will not hide how much data you receive/transmit.

a router can't run in repeater mode and do openvpn. it has to be in router mode. it would still work in router mode for the devices behind it but the double NAT complicates other things. check out an Asus AC68 for a good option that has a stock openvpn client.

router doesn't take any effort depending on what you buy. some have stock firmware with an openvpn client. then all you have to do is load up your config file.

it's 192.168.x.x , under the WebRTC section, correct? If so, that's nothing to worry about.

you don't browse the internet within the AirVPN software. get connected with the AirVPN software, then use your usual web browser, etc.

this would have the same problem as using your own VPS as a VPN server - it's got your info all over it.

It's easy to know you're using a VPN by your IP address if they've done their homework and logged all exit IP addresses of known VPN providers. maybe Amazon are in the midst of blocking VPN providers but the last time I tried Amazon video over VPN it worked. That was a few weeks ago.

not only that but in my experience NAT acceleration would "leak" by allowing connections made prior to the VPN connection to continue to exist instead of forcing everything through the VPN tunnel.

are you using merlin's build?