Leaderboard

Exactly. A business migration to an "offshore, sovereign nation" might seem like the best solution here, but it's just a hammer putting an angle to the nail. Sure, (Corporation, et al) Taxes might be lower elsewhere, but the proposed unregulated, dynamic blacklist system being implemented in Italy, applies globally to AirVPN's and all Italian resident-customers. If AirVPN were to still be a registered Italian business, and somehow implement technological bypasses of the blacklist to reallow Italian resident-customers, then even a layman could see an argument for detrimental culpability subject to their own business registation laws, if they wish to continue operating out of Italian jurisdiction. I'm certain that the Owners, Staff, Lawyers of AirVPN, being at least of Italian business registration since inception, are taking this legislative battle to heart. Many others will too: I'd bet there'll be an EU review into the frameworks implementation sooner rather than later, once it's filtering impact and resonance are actualised. @Staff Will do whatever they feel is most legal, and best feasible. But there's one reason why we're customers: A "VPN operated by activists in defense of net neutrality, privacy and against censorship." That time is now.

I feel for the Italians, but how can you challenge a corrupt government "this is all part of the plan" not country specific but world-wide ! One small step for Italy, one giant leap for World domination

The assumption is just speculation for the most part, if you are saying it is not the case then I have no other rebuttal to offer and will take it at face value. It does make some sense though that the inefficiency with ovpn when done en mass would result in slowdowns and total throughput limitations that are not line speed due to the additional time it takes in userland. measuring CPU in general is always a tough thing, its never as simple as just looking at the load counter which you well know. interrupts play a huge part in it, HT / SMT, CCDx / NUMA traversal and more. We know in general that ovpn is quite bloated and inefficient when compared to wireguard so the assumption at first glance doesn't seem without merit.

I faced the same issue when trying to install Eddie-UI from the Pamac GUI (from AUR). As a workaround, I had to do the following: 1. Install some of the dependencies using Pacman sudo pacman -S libdbusmenu-gtk3 sudo pacman -S cmake sudo pacman -S gobject-introspection sudo pacman -S vala 2. Install Eddie-UI from AUR using Pamac GUI by searching for "eddie-ui". This will install the libayata-appindicator along. P.S: Tested using Manjaro 23.1.3 (Kernel 6.6.10)

It's been a forum topic recently. Combination of hardware upgrades and some rethinking of definitions so that current usage and maximum available are measured the same way. Until now, they really weren't, so you'd sometimes see a 1000 Mb/s server supposedly running at 1500 Mb/s. The new system represents things more realistically.