Leaderboard

Discussed here:Again: What constitutes (un)lawful speech? Who defines this? EU making Poland pay for a wall in south EU really being fake news is probably unlawful and exempt from this, but so might be news about Poland replacing "inconvenient" judges which is true in nature but might be seen as unlawful and therefore exempt, therefore free to be removed, too. Double-edged sword. My thoughts are the same: Due to this a Poland server is unlikely, why exposing the AirVPN community to this crap?

Poland does not protect their citizens from ideological/government censorship, which is by far the greater threat there. https://rsf.org/en/poland https://rsf.org/en/news/poland-about-censor-privately-owned-media-its-hungarian-ally It is important to note that this is a double-edged sword which will definitely be used against people, even if implemented with good intentions. The underlying question is: What justifies removing a piece of information? A post about EU wanting to make Poland pay for some wall in the south against the waves of refugees will be a candidate since it's in fact wrong, and the problem is that an article about the govt. replacing "inconvenient" judges and journalists will be, too, being an inconvenient truth that will inevitably divide people. Exposing everyone in the world to this nonsense is a very, very bad idea. Which is why a Poland server is… improbable.