Tom Spark reviews Arivpn

[Casper31 73]

 
According Tom,transparency,privacy are very good,less about the avg speed .  Humm i find this a very cool conclusion!
Tom sparks youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Og0X6HeT3o

 

 

[OpenSourcerer 1359]

The video was embedded as an image. Can you edit your post and just dump the link?

[Flx 76]

@Casper31
Thank you for the video link. Very entertaining....to say the least
How Mr. Tom Spark only got only 100mbps AirVPN connected?
Here the latest speed test on speedtest.net(multi) on a TCP-Entry3 side-by-side triple session Native OpenVPN 2.5 wintun adapters scenario:
https://www.speedtest.net/result/9862679064

 

Edited ... by Flx
"triple session instead of triple mode" will make more sense

[go558a83nk 352]

46 minutes ago, Flx said:

@Casper31
Thank you for the video link. Very entertaining....to say the least
How Mr. Tom Spark only got only 100mbps AirVPN connected?
Here the latest speed test on speedtest.net(multi) on a TCP-Entry3 side-by-side triple mode Native OpenVPN 2.5 wintun adapters scenario:
https://www.speedtest.net/result/9862679064

 

What is "side-by-side triple mode" ?

[Flx 76]

11 minutes ago, go558a83nk said:

What is "side-by-side triple mode" ?

Concept not yet created?
How do you expect me to define it for you?
Let me try:
3 Wintun adapters connected at the same time to different VPN servers.( right now Avior/Lesath/Tyl )

 

[Flx 76]

Any single-mode app(Firefox browser) running will use one tunnel/session. Speedtest.net multi or utorrent/bittorrent etc. will use all interconnected wintun adapters...thus distributing the load in/out over the 3 servers connected.
Not sure I explain this very well. Sorry I can't write 20 pages on this or an essay.
Why do you even ask anyway? Think it cannot be done? 

[go558a83nk 352]

42 minutes ago, Flx said:

Any single-mode app(Firefox browser) running will use one tunnel/session. Speedtest.net multi or utorrent/bittorrent etc. will use all interconnected wintun adapters...thus distributing the load in/out over the 3 servers connected.
Not sure I explain this very well. Sorry I can't write 20 pages on this or an essay.
Why do you even ask anyway? Think it cannot be done? 

ha!  No need to explain.  I do the same thing in pfsense.  I just have never heard of it being done in windows and I didn't know you could run multiple instances of wintun.

[OpenSourcerer 1359]

At around 6:00, the reviewer said there was no favorite servers feature which is wrong. It's the green tick (whitelist), red cross (blacklist) and captionless (reset) buttons. Someone tell him to include a note in YouTube. Though it won't change the rating, it is a mistake.

[Flx 76]

On 8/4/2020 at 10:23 PM, go558a83nk said:

ha!  No need to explain.  I do the same thing in pfsense.  I just have never heard of it being done in windows and I didn't know you could run multiple instances of wintun.

In Windows it gets a bit tricky though. I did look for a way of doing this; and how it can be applied to qbit for example where you cannot achieve it just by simply having it bound or attached to the TAP interface.Blocking any other interface in Comodo Firewall other then the tap/tun interface.(the link below) works splendidly well. If your ISP reboots your main hub; there is No IN/OUT if all VPN sessions do in fact drop. All this has been well enough detailed in "GUIDE-the fix of the tap adapter for Windows". I hope. "Thanks for your answer on the router question where you suggested build your own pfsense" and use the pfsense as the GW(main point).